Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Comparison of 2 Web Hosts

Comparison of 2 Web Hosts

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpasp-netcomdata-structuressales
49 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lorenzo Bertolino

    To me (Italy) WinHost sits at 11.299 and SmarterASP.net at 10.812

    R Offline
    R Offline
    raddevus
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    very interesting that both of them are in the same range from Italy. thanks very much for running the test. :thumbsup:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I ikhalif nrrc

      beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
      endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
      171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

      beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
      endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
      119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      Thanks very much for trying this & reporting the results. Wow! I was curious if times would be longer from other locations around the world (other than North America). Someone reported that Italy was longer time too, but over 100 seconds is hardly even usable.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Sanders the other one

        WinHost: 12.8 SmarterASP.net: 1.6 So, night and day. If you're still looking for a decent Windows-based hosting service, try an outfit called Liquid Six. They are just great.

        Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

        R Offline
        R Offline
        raddevus
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        Thanks for trying it out & reporting. You saw similar differences that I & many others saw. I will look into Liquid Six. Thanks for the tip.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jonas Hammarberg

          Winhost 47.179s vs SmarterASP 2.965s (Sweden)

          R Offline
          R Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          Thanks for running the test & posting results. I see there's a large difference between the two in Sweden. :thumbsup:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Niels Holst

            (1) 44.74 s (!) (2) 5.30 s Accessed from a superfast, optical connection.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            raddevus
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            Another drastic difference in times. Thanks for running the test & posting.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R RDM Jr

              Cincinnati OH - WinHost 6.571 secs, SmarterASP 0.883 secs Through our corporate VPN (somewhere in Texas) WinHost 4.603 secs, SmarterASP 3.468 secs (but our VPN is slow at everything)

              R Offline
              R Offline
              raddevus
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              Thanks for running the tests & posting results. WinHost does seem to be consistently & drastically slower.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R raddevus

                Thanks for trying it out & reporting. You saw similar differences that I & many others saw. I will look into Liquid Six. Thanks for the tip.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paul Sanders the other one
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                Do, you won't regret it, they are ace. (I'm not affiliated with them in any way, just a happy customer and a big, big fan.)

                Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R raddevus

                  This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                  Quote:

                  99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                  I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gary SC59
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  Winhost approx 8 seconds. Smarter Asp approx 2 seconds. I suggest checking out Interserver.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R raddevus

                    This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                    Quote:

                    99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                    I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Neely
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    1.1s (winhost) vs 14.7s (sMaRtErAsP.nEt). From: PA, USA.

                    raddevus wrote:

                    SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS

                    This shouldn't matter unless they're using decade+ old servers; anything newer has hardware acceleration in the CPU and should see something like a 1% performance impact from HTTPS.

                    Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R raddevus

                      This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                      Quote:

                      99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                      I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mark Miller
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      Run from Rockford, Illinois Winhost: 13.496 SmarterASP: 6.489

                      Sincerely, -Mark mamiller@mhemail.org

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R raddevus

                        This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                        Quote:

                        99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                        I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Daniel Wilianto
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #34

                        The SmarterASP loads much much faster. I am located on Borneo Island.

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gary SC59

                          Winhost approx 8 seconds. Smarter Asp approx 2 seconds. I suggest checking out Interserver.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          raddevus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #35

                          Thanks so much for running the test. WinHost is consistently (from around the world) 2 - 10X slower.

                          Gary S 2021 wrote:

                          I suggest checking out Interserver.

                          :thumbsup: That's so funny, because I just (before reading your messsage) signed up for 1 month & I uploaded speedTest files & tesed & it was less than 1 second to load.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Mark Miller

                            Run from Rockford, Illinois Winhost: 13.496 SmarterASP: 6.489

                            Sincerely, -Mark mamiller@mhemail.org

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            raddevus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #36

                            Thanks for running the test & posting. WinHost does seem to be consistently 2x - 10x slower.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Daniel Wilianto

                              The SmarterASP loads much much faster. I am located on Borneo Island.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              raddevus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #37

                              Thanks for running the test & posting. Yep, smarterasp is consistently faster. thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R raddevus

                                This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                Quote:

                                99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                matblue25
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #38

                                I didn't time it exactly but, it took WinHost quite a long time. I could see the image being rendered block-by-block. At least 6-7 seconds. The SmarterASP site was less than a second, hardly noticeable. I'm in South Carolina, USA.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R raddevus

                                  This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                  Quote:

                                  99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                  I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  ShawnVN
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #39

                                  1. There are a few page-speed-test tools out there, that will hit your page from dozens of locations on planet earth.. measuring ttfb and full load time, etc. https://www.dotcom-tools.com/website-speed-test[^] 2. Things like HTTPS and HTTP/2 matter, hugely. 3. If you care about speed, reliability and security (incl. ddos-protection) you should really serve everything from a CDN edge-cache like Cloudflare or AWS CloudFront. Even if your content isn't cacheable.. just using a CF endpoint as a "proxy" will have huge benefits for short-circuiting roundtrips from browser-to-server. (Just establishing a single HTTPS connection requires several sequential TCP roundtrips.)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R raddevus

                                    This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                    Quote:

                                    99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                    I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    Choroid
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #40

                                    I tried this twice First Test WinHost 7.873 SmarterASP 7.703 Second Test WinHost 9.013 SmarterASP 7.717 I am in Northern Arizona and Frontier connection is either in Phoenix or Palo Alto So does location and ISP provider affect the numbers?

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Choroid

                                      I tried this twice First Test WinHost 7.873 SmarterASP 7.703 Second Test WinHost 9.013 SmarterASP 7.717 I am in Northern Arizona and Frontier connection is either in Phoenix or Palo Alto So does location and ISP provider affect the numbers?

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      raddevus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #41

                                      Thanks for trying it out. And, I do believe that it does matter where you are physically located in relation to where my web server is located. It's a very odd thing actually & I've learned a bit about it but it is still quite confusing. Most people saw WinHost 2x - 10x slower. But I did notice that if you are "closer" to the WinHost one it could resolve just as fast.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R raddevus

                                        This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                        Quote:

                                        99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                        I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        RobertSF
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #42

                                        raddevus wrote:

                                        Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for each site? 1) WinHost Site: Test Load Speed[^] 2) SmarterASP.net site: Test Load Speed[^]

                                        Well, I didn't get such bad results. The first, via newlibre.com

                                        Testing Load Speed
                                        beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:33:57 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                        endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:34:01 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                        3.721 seconds elapsed during load.

                                        The second, via cyapass.com

                                        Testing Load Speed
                                        beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:33:50 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                        endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:33:52 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                        2.036 seconds elapsed during load.

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R RobertSF

                                          raddevus wrote:

                                          Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for each site? 1) WinHost Site: Test Load Speed[^] 2) SmarterASP.net site: Test Load Speed[^]

                                          Well, I didn't get such bad results. The first, via newlibre.com

                                          Testing Load Speed
                                          beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:33:57 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                          endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:34:01 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                          3.721 seconds elapsed during load.

                                          The second, via cyapass.com

                                          Testing Load Speed
                                          beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:33:50 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                          endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 15:33:52 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
                                          2.036 seconds elapsed during load.

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          raddevus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #43

                                          Actually, I have now switched (and the DNS seems to have propagated through) to amazingly fast InterServer.net web host. I believe your test (newlibre.com) probably hit the new site ip address 162.246.23.194. Thanks very much for trying it out.:thumbsup:

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups