Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. ClosedXML odd behavior

ClosedXML odd behavior

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpcsharpdotnetcomsysadmin
32 Posts 11 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Why not use something that is supported: Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel Namespace | Microsoft Learn[^] or Working with MS Excel(xls / xlsx) Using MDAC and Oledb[^]?

    Y Offline
    Y Offline
    yacCarsten
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    You can't install Interop on a server because of licencing. Well you can or used to be able to, but it took couple of registry hacks.

    // TODO: Insert something here

    Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K kmoorevs

      Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

      Y Offline
      Y Offline
      yacCarsten
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      This is why I avoided ClosedXML and work directly with OpenXML. I didn't like the idea of an update breaking something. This is an alternate suggestion if it feasible for you, I used the following snippet to build my own function: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7208914/how-do-you-convert-excel-to-csv-using-openxml-sdk[^]

      // TODO: Insert something here

      Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Y yacCarsten

        This is why I avoided ClosedXML and work directly with OpenXML. I didn't like the idea of an update breaking something. This is an alternate suggestion if it feasible for you, I used the following snippet to build my own function: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7208914/how-do-you-convert-excel-to-csv-using-openxml-sdk[^]

        // TODO: Insert something here

        Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

        K Offline
        K Offline
        kmoorevs
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Thanks, This looks promising! :thumbsup: I've requested the problem file be sent as a csv. Failing that, I'll definitely give it a go. :)

        "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K kmoorevs

          Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Luca Leonardo Scorcia
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

          Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Why not use something that is supported: Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel Namespace | Microsoft Learn[^] or Working with MS Excel(xls / xlsx) Using MDAC and Oledb[^]?

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Avoid Interop.

            L A 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • Y yacCarsten

              You can't install Interop on a server because of licencing. Well you can or used to be able to, but it took couple of registry hacks.

              // TODO: Insert something here

              Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Or in our case it wasn't allowed.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Luca Leonardo Scorcia

                There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

                Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Unless "they" who control the data centers don't allow it on the servers.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K kmoorevs

                  Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  PIEBALDconsult
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Never used it. What are you trying to do with it? Because I only needed to read it, I rolled my own XLSX reader.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K kmoorevs

                    Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                    pkfoxP Offline
                    pkfoxP Offline
                    pkfox
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                    In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                      Avoid Interop.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K kmoorevs

                        Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard Deeming
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        kmoorevs wrote:

                        .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                        Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                        K 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                          kmoorevs wrote:

                          .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                          Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kmoorevs
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Richard Deeming wrote:

                          Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                          4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                          "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                          Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pkfoxP pkfox

                            I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                            In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            kmoorevs
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            pkfox wrote:

                            NPOI

                            Funny, the author of the spreadsheets show as Apache POI. Related?

                            "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                            pkfoxP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K kmoorevs

                              Richard Deeming wrote:

                              Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                              4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                              "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                              Richard DeemingR Offline
                              Richard DeemingR Offline
                              Richard Deeming
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Any particular reason? 4.7.2 will make your life much easier when you want to reference a .NET Standard 2.0 library, and I don't recall seeing any breaking changes. I think the only thing that "broke" for me was an ambiguous reference error for a custom extension method I'd written, which had the same name as one they added to the BCL in 4.7.2. :)


                              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                PIEBALDconsult
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Not saying it doesn't.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P PIEBALDconsult

                                  Not saying it doesn't.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  But that was the implication from:

                                  Quote:

                                  Avoid Interop.

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    But that was the implication from:

                                    Quote:

                                    Avoid Interop.

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    PIEBALDconsult
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    No it isn't.

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                                      No it isn't.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      Well, what is your point?

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Well, what is your point?

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        PIEBALDconsult
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        Exactly what I said.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                                          Exactly what I said.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          I see, just trolling.

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups