Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. ClosedXML odd behavior

ClosedXML odd behavior

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpcsharpdotnetcomsysadmin
32 Posts 11 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K kmoorevs

    Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

    Y Offline
    Y Offline
    yacCarsten
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    This is why I avoided ClosedXML and work directly with OpenXML. I didn't like the idea of an update breaking something. This is an alternate suggestion if it feasible for you, I used the following snippet to build my own function: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7208914/how-do-you-convert-excel-to-csv-using-openxml-sdk[^]

    // TODO: Insert something here

    Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Y yacCarsten

      This is why I avoided ClosedXML and work directly with OpenXML. I didn't like the idea of an update breaking something. This is an alternate suggestion if it feasible for you, I used the following snippet to build my own function: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7208914/how-do-you-convert-excel-to-csv-using-openxml-sdk[^]

      // TODO: Insert something here

      Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

      K Offline
      K Offline
      kmoorevs
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Thanks, This looks promising! :thumbsup: I've requested the problem file be sent as a csv. Failing that, I'll definitely give it a go. :)

      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kmoorevs

        Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Luca Leonardo Scorcia
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

        Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Why not use something that is supported: Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel Namespace | Microsoft Learn[^] or Working with MS Excel(xls / xlsx) Using MDAC and Oledb[^]?

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Avoid Interop.

          L A 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Y yacCarsten

            You can't install Interop on a server because of licencing. Well you can or used to be able to, but it took couple of registry hacks.

            // TODO: Insert something here

            Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Or in our case it wasn't allowed.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Luca Leonardo Scorcia

              There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

              Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Unless "they" who control the data centers don't allow it on the servers.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K kmoorevs

                Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Never used it. What are you trying to do with it? Because I only needed to read it, I rolled my own XLSX reader.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K kmoorevs

                  Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                  pkfoxP Offline
                  pkfoxP Offline
                  pkfox
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                  In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                    Avoid Interop.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K kmoorevs

                      Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                      Richard DeemingR Offline
                      Richard DeemingR Offline
                      Richard Deeming
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      kmoorevs wrote:

                      .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                      Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                        kmoorevs wrote:

                        .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                        Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        kmoorevs
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Richard Deeming wrote:

                        Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                        4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                        "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                        Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pkfoxP pkfox

                          I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                          In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kmoorevs
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          pkfox wrote:

                          NPOI

                          Funny, the author of the spreadsheets show as Apache POI. Related?

                          "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                          pkfoxP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K kmoorevs

                            Richard Deeming wrote:

                            Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                            4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                            "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                            Richard DeemingR Offline
                            Richard DeemingR Offline
                            Richard Deeming
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            Any particular reason? 4.7.2 will make your life much easier when you want to reference a .NET Standard 2.0 library, and I don't recall seeing any breaking changes. I think the only thing that "broke" for me was an ambiguous reference error for a custom extension method I'd written, which had the same name as one they added to the BCL in 4.7.2. :)


                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PIEBALDconsult
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              Not saying it doesn't.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P PIEBALDconsult

                                Not saying it doesn't.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                But that was the implication from:

                                Quote:

                                Avoid Interop.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  But that was the implication from:

                                  Quote:

                                  Avoid Interop.

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  PIEBALDconsult
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  No it isn't.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                                    No it isn't.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Well, what is your point?

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Well, what is your point?

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      PIEBALDconsult
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      Exactly what I said.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P PIEBALDconsult

                                        Exactly what I said.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        I see, just trolling.

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          I see, just trolling.

                                          P Offline
                                          P Offline
                                          PIEBALDconsult
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          Nope, just offering unsolicited advice.

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups