Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. ClosedXML odd behavior

ClosedXML odd behavior

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpcsharpdotnetcomsysadmin
32 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Y yacCarsten

    This is why I avoided ClosedXML and work directly with OpenXML. I didn't like the idea of an update breaking something. This is an alternate suggestion if it feasible for you, I used the following snippet to build my own function: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7208914/how-do-you-convert-excel-to-csv-using-openxml-sdk[^]

    // TODO: Insert something here

    Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

    K Offline
    K Offline
    kmoorevs
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Thanks, This looks promising! :thumbsup: I've requested the problem file be sent as a csv. Failing that, I'll definitely give it a go. :)

    "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K kmoorevs

      Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Luca Leonardo Scorcia
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

      Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Why not use something that is supported: Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel Namespace | Microsoft Learn[^] or Working with MS Excel(xls / xlsx) Using MDAC and Oledb[^]?

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Avoid Interop.

        L A 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Y yacCarsten

          You can't install Interop on a server because of licencing. Well you can or used to be able to, but it took couple of registry hacks.

          // TODO: Insert something here

          Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Or in our case it wasn't allowed.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Luca Leonardo Scorcia

            There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

            Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Unless "they" who control the data centers don't allow it on the servers.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K kmoorevs

              Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Never used it. What are you trying to do with it? Because I only needed to read it, I rolled my own XLSX reader.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K kmoorevs

                Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                pkfoxP Offline
                pkfoxP Offline
                pkfox
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  Avoid Interop.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K kmoorevs

                    Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                    Richard DeemingR Offline
                    Richard DeemingR Offline
                    Richard Deeming
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    kmoorevs wrote:

                    .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                    Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                      kmoorevs wrote:

                      .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                      Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      kmoorevs
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Richard Deeming wrote:

                      Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                      4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                      Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pkfoxP pkfox

                        I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                        In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        kmoorevs
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        pkfox wrote:

                        NPOI

                        Funny, the author of the spreadsheets show as Apache POI. Related?

                        "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                        pkfoxP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K kmoorevs

                          Richard Deeming wrote:

                          Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                          4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                          "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                          Richard DeemingR Offline
                          Richard DeemingR Offline
                          Richard Deeming
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Any particular reason? 4.7.2 will make your life much easier when you want to reference a .NET Standard 2.0 library, and I don't recall seeing any breaking changes. I think the only thing that "broke" for me was an ambiguous reference error for a custom extension method I'd written, which had the same name as one they added to the BCL in 4.7.2. :)


                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            PIEBALDconsult
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Not saying it doesn't.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P PIEBALDconsult

                              Not saying it doesn't.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              But that was the implication from:

                              Quote:

                              Avoid Interop.

                              P 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                But that was the implication from:

                                Quote:

                                Avoid Interop.

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                PIEBALDconsult
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                No it isn't.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P PIEBALDconsult

                                  No it isn't.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Well, what is your point?

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Well, what is your point?

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    PIEBALDconsult
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Exactly what I said.

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                                      Exactly what I said.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      I see, just trolling.

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        I see, just trolling.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        PIEBALDconsult
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Nope, just offering unsolicited advice.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                                          Nope, just offering unsolicited advice.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Feel free not to bother in future.

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups