Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. ClosedXML odd behavior

ClosedXML odd behavior

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpcsharpdotnetcomsysadmin
32 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K kmoorevs

    Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Luca Leonardo Scorcia
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

    Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Why not use something that is supported: Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel Namespace | Microsoft Learn[^] or Working with MS Excel(xls / xlsx) Using MDAC and Oledb[^]?

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PIEBALDconsult
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Avoid Interop.

      L A 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Y yacCarsten

        You can't install Interop on a server because of licencing. Well you can or used to be able to, but it took couple of registry hacks.

        // TODO: Insert something here

        Top ten reasons why I'm lazy 1.

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Or in our case it wasn't allowed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Luca Leonardo Scorcia

          There's also the option to use Excel spreadsheet library for .NET Framework/Core - EPPlus Software[^] . There's a FAQ about licensing, depending on your requirements YMMV.

          Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur. (But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.) -- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Unless "they" who control the data centers don't allow it on the servers.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kmoorevs

            Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Never used it. What are you trying to do with it? Because I only needed to read it, I rolled my own XLSX reader.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K kmoorevs

              Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

              pkfoxP Offline
              pkfoxP Offline
              pkfox
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

              In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                Avoid Interop.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K kmoorevs

                  Firstly, I am not asking for help on a programming issue here. I'm mostly just trying to see if anyone else here is or has in the past been experiencing any problems using the ClosedXML .Net library to open/read Excel files. I have a simple process that has worked every day flawlessly for over 2 years, then out of the blue, started failing. :confused: Basically, ClosedXML was choking trying to open an Excel (*.xlsx) file. By choking, I mean it was an IO exception reporting that the file was corrupted. The weird thing is, I can copy that file to my desktop, open it in Excel, save it, copy it back to the server, and it works fine. :wtf: I am aware that a new version of OpenXML was released (right around the time that my process began failing???) with quite a few breaking changes. Coincidence?...I don't know yet. What's new in the Open XML SDK | Microsoft Learn[^] What I've tried: 0: Go to GitHub and get the latest ClosedXML libs. So this required a .net framework upgrade to 4.6+. No problem...compiles, go to open a spreadsheet and it complains about the XMLDocument version...go to GitHub, get that version and try again. It compiles fine, go to open a spreadsheet and now it whines about a netstandard library that it can't find. (sure this is an indication of inccompatibility) I tried different versions/combinations but the only way to get it working again was by reverting back to the original framework and original libraries. Back to square one. :doh: 1: Plead with the new IT guy responsible for scheduling that job to please change the format to CSV! :laugh: (the previous IT guy was on a power trip and refused to change it despite numerous requests) 2: Investigating the idea of simply extracting the sheet1.xml file from the archive and parsing it out. Then I wonder why if it was that easy, why there are so few solutions that mention this approach. It's possible that I'm looking at an extremely simple/limited structure (no formulas/formatting/etc.) in this particular file, but it looks feasible. In the event that #1 fails, this will probably be the next path of attack. 3: Install Excel on the customer's server. Ya know, they did give me an admin account so in theory, I can install anything required to get the job done. Also, I have an old Office 2007 disk around here that

                  Richard DeemingR Offline
                  Richard DeemingR Offline
                  Richard Deeming
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  kmoorevs wrote:

                  .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                  Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                    kmoorevs wrote:

                    .net framework upgrade to 4.6+ ... whines about a netstandard library that it can't find

                    Which version did you actually upgrade to? .NET Standard 2.0 sort-of works with 4.6.1+, but it has several issues. Microsoft recommend using at least 4.7.2: .NET Standard - .NET | Microsoft Learn[^]


                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kmoorevs
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Richard Deeming wrote:

                    Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                    4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                    "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                    Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pkfoxP pkfox

                      I've used [NPOI](https://github.com/dotnetcore/NPOI) for years without any problems

                      In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      kmoorevs
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      pkfox wrote:

                      NPOI

                      Funny, the author of the spreadsheets show as Apache POI. Related?

                      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                      pkfoxP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K kmoorevs

                        Richard Deeming wrote:

                        Which version did you actually upgrade to?

                        4.6.1 first then 4.7.2. Neither worked. Back to 4.5.2. :)

                        "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                        Richard Deeming
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Any particular reason? 4.7.2 will make your life much easier when you want to reference a .NET Standard 2.0 library, and I don't recall seeing any breaking changes. I think the only thing that "broke" for me was an ambiguous reference error for a custom extension method I'd written, which had the same name as one they added to the BCL in 4.7.2. :)


                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I have used it on a number of occasions and it works well.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          PIEBALDconsult
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Not saying it doesn't.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            Not saying it doesn't.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            But that was the implication from:

                            Quote:

                            Avoid Interop.

                            P 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              But that was the implication from:

                              Quote:

                              Avoid Interop.

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PIEBALDconsult
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              No it isn't.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P PIEBALDconsult

                                No it isn't.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Well, what is your point?

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Well, what is your point?

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  PIEBALDconsult
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Exactly what I said.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                                    Exactly what I said.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    I see, just trolling.

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      I see, just trolling.

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      PIEBALDconsult
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Nope, just offering unsolicited advice.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P PIEBALDconsult

                                        Nope, just offering unsolicited advice.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Feel free not to bother in future.

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K kmoorevs

                                          pkfox wrote:

                                          NPOI

                                          Funny, the author of the spreadsheets show as Apache POI. Related?

                                          "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"

                                          pkfoxP Offline
                                          pkfoxP Offline
                                          pkfox
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          Yes they ported it from POI

                                          In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups