Just get a JRPG bag. Not only do they hold 100,000kg of various-sized stuff, but they're invisible, and no trouble to carry. Is there a prize for solving this one?  Where do I claim it? I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Yeah, yeah, yeah.  "Proficiency takes less time", "Troubleshooting takes less time", etc. Let's not dwell on the fact that designing a simple system takes either (and sometimes both): • Ten times as long • A large wealth of experience Neither of which is readily available to most start-ups. He might as well tell them that all they need is five billion euros (real billions, not the tiny US ones). I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

i know i can break the query into two separate to achieve this job but i need to know if i want to do left & inner join in same query then how could i compose it. i stuck for syntax. if you know then post a sample LINQ query where left & inner join will be performed in same query. thanks

You speak in jest, but that's where one can find many a true word. I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Maybe you can run (fast) with Docker shoes :-\

Nope, I've told others the same thing I've told you. =) Real programmers use butterflies

A code snippet wouldn't help because it's sporadic. Sometimes works, sometimes doesn't, for the same code.

The scary bit is a few "skills" that haven't dropped to zero yet like Flash or WinXP. :omg: :wtf: Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

That was my first thought but when I opened the Q&A section, I saw the questions were trivial... And I haven't had a good experience asking a bit difficult question. Check out [this](https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/5162092/Java-annotationprocessing-generating-files-at-each) question I asked about 5 months ago, still un-answered.

That's fair. However, if you ever have to write a parser, you'll need a tokenizer, and those run on finite state machines. You don't *need* to use regex to create them (in fact, my parser construction kit, PCK lets you define them using an EBNF variant if you want) but one way or another you need a declarative way to describe a state machine that can be used for pattern matching if you're going to be tokenizing. Interestingly enough, state machines like this don't have to be limited to text. You could in theory use them to do pattern matching over collections of objects for example. When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.

Things would be so much easier if you used the built-in controls. :) DataPager Class (System.Web.UI.WebControls) | Microsoft Docs[^] ListView Class (System.Web.UI.WebControls) | Microsoft Docs[^] If you want to continue with your custom paging, you'll need to modify your doPaging method to only add rows for the page numbers you want to display. "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

I will explain these in the most simple words, but you need to bear with me that the usage of these images is not for general cases, they are specialized images available for special needs. Quote: servercore, nanoserver, dotnet-framework As their names suggest, they are the images for [Windows Server](https://hub.docker.com/\_/microsoft-windows-servercore), and here is the description for the image, Quote: The official Windows Server Core base image for containers And that clears up that this image is the base image for containers that would work on Windows Server. Same for others, for example the dotnet-framework. Who doesn't know this one? Oh, and to your curiosity, there is still a .NET SDK image as well that provides a base image for your build tool. Quote: which ones are more or less complete applications rather than primarily intended as base images. Like I said, they all have their specialized features, there is [Windows docker image](https://hub.docker.com/\_/microsoft-windows), if that is what you mean. Comparing Ubuntu with Windows Server, or .NET framework is like comparing oranges to apple juice (get it?). Quote: how this alaternative compares to other alternatives. Seems like you have not been working on Windows environments lately, or perhaps you are a Linux guy, because that is pretty much clear the way Windows works. Windows has some native app development frameworks, Win32, MFC, WinRT (Windows Runtime) and Universal Apps, and then there are some modern frameworks (older actually!) like .NET framework, .NET Core, .NET Standard, and much more... Then there are different flavors of Windows like Windows for consumers—the Windows we use—and Windows Server for workloads, think of that as Ubuntu Server, then there is Windows for IoT, Windows Mobile (dead almost), and whatnot... Man, Windows is merely 2 years younger than this universe, and ever expanding. :-) I would recommend spending some time with Windows development environments and these names will make much more sense than they do right now. Quote: Is there anywhere to be found a "comparison chart" This is something that I completely agree with, for beginners this can be helpful. :thumbsup: Would you like to contribute your

Dan Neely wrote: while (!giveThePlatformUpEntirely) { DecideRemovingAnyPartOfTheCurrentStackIsImpossible(); CreateAToolToMakeManagingTheEntireStackEasier(); RealizeNewToolMakesStuffToComplex(); } Syntax Error: Method name incorrect. RealizeNewToolMakesStuffTooComplex() :-D :-\ "When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others; same thing when you are stupid." Ignorant - An individual without knowledge, but is willing to learn. Stupid - An individual without knowledge and is incapable of learning. Idiot - An individual without knowledge and allows social media to do the thinking for them.

Aw, now I have a sad. That is so much better than mine. Well done. TTFN - Kent

Eddy Vluggen wrote: Wordsmithing Or "spin". Yeah, very likely a way to put a positive light on chickens which aren't free-range. Similarly, some years back KFC was advertising that their chicken parts were now something like a third larger than previously... which I took to mean that they were buying larger, older, tougher chickens and trying to make them sound more desirable.

To muse on what she might have accomplished had she been of our time... Cheers, Mike Fidler "I intend to live forever - so far, so good." Steven Wright "I almost had a psychic girlfriend but she left me before we met." Also Steven Wright "I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Steven Wright yet again.

Hi there. I am new to this forum. Thanks for the useful information.

didn't Chris tell you to back off? If you had some sense you'd just block me and move on with your life. When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.