Richard Deeming wrote: it has built-in support for generating a C# snippet Well that is interesting information. I would not have even thought to look for that.

Yes. I mentioned I was able to manually download the file. I saw similar questions in other discussions that said to post here, so I did. I can post a new question elsewhere thanks for the tip.

A witch after my own heart - learn and use what you need, ignore what you don't.

Primitives are what "comes before". And it depends on your model. If you want to "generate constellations", then you need stars. "Generative AI" is where you tell it to write stuff; or draw stuff. You need to find your stuff. "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

Harrison Pratt wrote: The closer you look, the worse it gets! Your statement cracked me up! :laugh: Indeed it does. It's why most people choose to not look at things very closely. :laugh:

Since the license makes it free you can post in the Free Tools forum.

Kent Sharkey wrote: another step toward GM’s ultimate goal of the Software Defined Vehicle. set frame = noRust Or something like that! All good! Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

Gerry Schmitz wrote: Your design is flawed; Good catch. That would need to be resolved before anything can proceed.

I'm going to look for other ways to change gamma and brightness as this function has too many limitations on hardware. In the past I used SetDeviceGammaRamp[^] for changing gamma, but now it seems that function shouldn't be used anymore. If anyone has some suggestion, they are welcomed and helpful.

honey the codewitch wrote: The docs don't reflect the latest changes. keep that in mind with your own docs. honey the codewitch wrote: Am I to the learn the API telepathically? I have created many interfaces to non-trivial systems. I have just gotten used to it. I remember one case where the certification problem for a credit card processor was settled between two of their techs (not me) by one of them declaring that the account was theirs so I would just need to follow what they said and not the other tech.

I smelled plagiarism as well, but couldn't find anything concrete enough. "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

Rod at work wrote: Secrets are in all our source code. Well that is a problem! Perhaps you should find a solution for the older apps first. Updating only that part. Only then, and to be a consistent, new apps would use it in the same way. Not to give away a secret though - I doubt github can find all secrets. So you can probably find a way to obfuscate in the code. But that should be a stopgap.

First, you're return type is a Task, not what you're really returning, so you have to fix that. Next, the return statement just needs the "object" part removed. Lastly, the other answer is correct. You're jumping in the deep end without knowing how to swim. This is NOT tested, so don't go expecting this to work immediately: public async TVShow GetTvShowData() { HttpClient client = new HttpClient(); var content = await client.GetStringAsync("https://api.themoviedb.org/3/tv/136311?api\_key=XXXXXXX&language=en-US"); TVShow myDeserializedClass = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(content); return myDeserializedClass; } Asking questions is a skill CodeProject Forum Guidelines Google: C# How to debug code Seriously, go read these articles. Dave Kreskowiak

Nand32 wrote: All these are needed for interops between different HC systems....App DB schema I guess you really mean something like 'data model' rather than 'database' which would be what I see when you say "DB". Nand32 wrote: What would you recommend? That requires much more detail about the architecture than what you presented here. Given that there are different systems then who controls/owns those systems? That is important. But other than that transforming data between systems on communication pipelines is always a given. Even if was a good idea to use the same standard for all each system must still serialize/deserialize the binary into data. So the transform layer will always exists. And it depends on the systems on the pipe. It would seem really unlikely that you could create one template/definition to which every single system must conform when those systems must in fact be each doing something different. Not without adding unneeded complexity. What happens if you provide one standard to which 100 systems must adhere and yet a change is needed so just 2 of those systems can be updated? So ignoring all of that, if the existing external models can be easily broken down (important) to sub-models which mostly meet the communication needs of two systems, then you can use that between those two systems. But I suspect you will still need an envelope into which the sub-model is passed.

You should generally avoid async void methods[^]. As per David Fowler's async guidance[^], you can either use Task.Run to push the execution onto a background thread, or call a Task-returning method and "discard" the returned task. Either option will allow exceptions to fire the TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException event[^] rather than crashing the application from the finalizer thread. In this case: internal class MainWindowViewModel { private MyEntity _data; private async Task LoadData() { \_data = await \_repository.GETDataAsync(); // TODO: Raise any "property changed" events to notify the view that the data has loaded. } public void WindowLoadedExecuted() { \_ = LoadData(); } } "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

You must upload your image to CMS then you can use it. You can refer to this post to see how I dispose the image on this post.https://www.chipsmall.com/blog/cheapest-electronic-components-online.html[^]