Kent Sharkey wrote: Anyone see my coat? It's in a box... Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

Anyone who believes that this would work should read James P.Hogan's "[The Two Faces of Tomorrow](http://www.sfreviews.net/2faces.html)". Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

CodeProject.AI is a specific project run by the CodeProject staff. So any question related to this project and its usage should be posted in its own discussion forum. Mainly because that is where the project team go to look for questions. The general AI forum is for general, i.e. non-CodeProject.AI, questions. If you look on the CodeProject home page at the picture at the top, it has a link to the correct forum.

Hmm. My employer has us do 'business conduct' and other training every year. No one is exempt, including the president. It's not too arduous and can usually be completed in an hour or so. Completing the training is a condition for continued employment. I've never heard of anyone being fired for not completing it, but I wouldn't want to work with anyone who was so argumentative and confrontational that they wouldn't comply with a reasonable request. I could see the company creating a policy for using AI-generated material on the job. Intellectual property rights are a significant concern for us in places, and given the cloudy (pardon the pun) nature of much AI training data, it's a reasonable response. As far as governmental regulation goes, I'm sure that's going to be a goat:elephant: from the word go. Software Zen: delete this;

:( "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

No, no, no. You're misunderstanding them. YOU aren't the user, you're the product. The corporations are the users

The best performance booster... upgrade back to windows 7 :-D I know... I know... It was just a joke... wasn't it? M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Kent Sharkey wrote: techies tasked with retrieving data from busted gear That's why I always give all my gadgets a round of hammer and screwdriver and CDs / DVDs get a peeling with a rock before taking them to recycle. M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

obermd wrote: It seems that every single week we're bombarded with a battery breakthrough that invalidates the purchase of today's crop of EVs. How would they then be able to justify asking for more fonds? M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Thank you for the information.

There have been some bad bugs with XMP/bios relationships where using XMP would force a lower voltage than what the RAM wanted. I wonder if you ran into that.

Harvard esp. so :) Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

Configure projects to target platforms - Visual Studio (Windows) | Microsoft Learn[^] An interesting/easy thing to try is building specifically for x86 and x64, testing both. It's a bit weird this isn't inverted. (x64 = AMD instruction sets, afaik - even on Intel chips) Aside that, I think strings being a bit of a special animal is likely playing into this heavily. Also, setting a .Tag to an object (instead of a string) is "weird" but that weirdness may be a figment of my imagination and that may be a perfectly normal thing to do.

Absolutely, blue Iris, and code dev, promotes sensual programming, once Kubernites is linux developed.

Jeremy Falcon wrote: that won't stop me from taking a moment to gripe about wishing devs took their job more seriously That's true for all of us, not just you web jocks. "It compiles without errors? Why doesn't it work?" "Well, how many warnings?" "I dunno. A bunch, but they don't matter. I just ignore them." :suss: X| :confused: :omg: Software Zen: delete this;