Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Who called it "malloc()"...

Who called it "malloc()"...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptcloudcsharplinqcom
16 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

    And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

    Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

    F Offline
    F Offline
    Fueled By Decaff
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I would call it bob_hope()

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

      And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

      Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Daniel Pfeffer
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Nothing wrong with the name, but I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more [spectacular](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhUnSOBTbM8). :)

      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

        And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

        Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

        H Offline
        H Offline
        honey the codewitch
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡

        To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

          And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

          Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

          T Offline
          T Offline
          trønderen
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

          D D 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • T trønderen

            We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            dandy72
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            I'm sure the coding style would result in a religious war.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T trønderen

              We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              DRHuff
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Could have just gone with Allahc!

              If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Daniel Pfeffer

                Nothing wrong with the name, but I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more [spectacular](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhUnSOBTbM8). :)

                Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gary R Wheeler
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more spectacular

                CRASH! isn't spectacular enough for you?

                Software Zen: delete this;

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D DRHuff

                  Could have just gone with Allahc!

                  If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gary R Wheeler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  I knew that one was coming. Of course y'all realize you're goin' to hell in a not-particularly-comfortable handbasket, now don't ya?

                  Software Zen: delete this;

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Gary R Wheeler

                    Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                    I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more spectacular

                    CRASH! isn't spectacular enough for you?

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Daniel Pfeffer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    That's only relevant to protected-memory O/Ses (most of them, these days, I'll grant). Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL, while your program went off into hyperspace. If every NULL reference cost the perpetrator money out of pocket (e.g. if the computer literally crashed and burned), I'm sure that software quality would have been much higher.

                    Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Daniel Pfeffer

                      That's only relevant to protected-memory O/Ses (most of them, these days, I'll grant). Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL, while your program went off into hyperspace. If every NULL reference cost the perpetrator money out of pocket (e.g. if the computer literally crashed and burned), I'm sure that software quality would have been much higher.

                      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      Gary R Wheeler
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                      Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL

                      Back in the day my product ran under the DOS4GW extender (just like DOOM!). In that environment I had both real-mode and protected-mode code for things like interrupt services in order to reduce unnecessary mode switches. Dereferencing NULL meant different things happened depending on which mode you were in. My hindsight has cataracts, so good times.

                      Software Zen: delete this;

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups