Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I hate something I know nothing about...

I hate something I know nothing about...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptlearningcsharpcssvisual-studio
48 Posts 18 Posters 4 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jeremy Falcon

    You don't know the difference between a language, the DOM and browser, and browser issues. You're not an expert... no matter how much you pretend to be online.

    Jeremy Falcon

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Member_5893260
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Yeah, you're probably right. After all, I've only been programming since 1978, and have only written nine compilers. Perhaps, on the other hand, you should actually read what I wrote, rather than reacting like an infant.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

      Jeremy Falcon wrote:

      I did something called growing up

      Yet in our most recent discussion you didn't hesitate to assume I know nothing about JavaScript just because I disagree with you (and now you're assuming you know more than pretty much the entirety of CP). I've worked with JavaScript for over ten years (mostly front-end, mind you), I did some non-trivial work in it, and I can simply say it's a horrible language. I'm not saying it can't do stuff, I'm saying it has way too many WTFs and doing stuff is often hard or weird. The way it handles NaN (which you can easily get, for example by doing 1 - {}, yet 1 + {} yields a string), how "this" is handled is just pure madness, many WTFs with basic operators (like the + and - of a number and object, now try + and - on a string and number), missing basic functionality (although that's getting better), the lack of an integer type or a "safe" decimal type, the whole ecosystem which forces you to install 100s of dependencies of which some have a single line of code (padLeft, anyone?), and the list goes on. It wasn't to long ago where the only sure way to check if an object is an array was Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === "[object Array]" and for NaN obj !== obj despite the isNaN and isArray functions! You seem to love JavaScript for some reason, the rest of the world hates it. But of course the rest of the world must be wrong. You claim people lack the maturity to not be overly emotional about crap, yet you seem overly emotional about JavaScript. Let's be mature about it and agree to disagree.

      Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jeremy Falcon
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Btw, I'm not wasting my time on your posts anymore when you've proven you don't even read mine before you do your hate thing. I expected more out of you.

      Jeremy Falcon

      Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Member_5893260

        Yeah, you're probably right. After all, I've only been programming since 1978, and have only written nine compilers. Perhaps, on the other hand, you should actually read what I wrote, rather than reacting like an infant.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jeremy Falcon
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        You can insult me, that doesn't mean I'm wrong. It means your old and still haven't learned to communicate or speak in concepts. Tootles.

        Jeremy Falcon

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jeremy Falcon

          You can insult me, that doesn't mean I'm wrong. It means your old and still haven't learned to communicate or speak in concepts. Tootles.

          Jeremy Falcon

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Member_5893260
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Attack what I said, then, instead of attacking me. By doing that, you lose automatically. Go on: tell me why I'm wrong. It's such fun when children get hold of the power tools.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Member_5893260

            Attack what I said, then, instead of attacking me. By doing that, you lose automatically. Go on: tell me why I'm wrong. It's such fun when children get hold of the power tools.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jeremy Falcon
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            You're not an expert, son. But, you are wasting my time. So, enjoy having the last word....

            Jeremy Falcon

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jeremy Falcon

              You're not an expert, son. But, you are wasting my time. So, enjoy having the last word....

              Jeremy Falcon

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Member_5893260
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              Whatever. "Add ignorant to deluded giving Dunning-Kruger", as they say in Cobol, which is a language in which people write shopping lists and convince themselves they're programmers. And you've still failed to do anything other than insult me, from which I learn that you're actually talking to a mirror and I'm just listening.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jeremy Falcon

                Btw, I'm not wasting my time on your posts anymore when you've proven you don't even read mine before you do your hate thing. I expected more out of you.

                Jeremy Falcon

                Sander RosselS Offline
                Sander RosselS Offline
                Sander Rossel
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                Jeremy Falcon wrote:

                when you've proven you don't even read mine

                I've read it, as I have read other posts of yours, and if there's one thing I can conclude it's that you're far from "grown up". See ya later, "mid".

                Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Amarnath S

                  I know this for a fact, because I have seen this Physics Prof, and sat through his sessions, where he used to make remarks on things he was having only hearsay kind of knowledge. (He is not alive anymore, so I will not name him).

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  haughtonomous
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  Forgive me, but hearing something said by someone else doesn't make it a fact. The history of science is littered with mistakes by scientists who were adamant that they were right about something, when it later turned out they were completely wrong.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups