Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
"It didn't directly impact me or it wasn't so bad for me, so it isn't as bad as they are saying."
I specifically did not say that so either you are being way too emotional or dishonest. I'd love to have a civil conversation but you seem to be taking this too emotional. Sorry for the experiences you have had. But that does not diminish my experiences, and as I already stated, nor do my experiences diminish yours. Have a good day.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
listen to the entire speech, or just got your information from some right-wing "news" site. It was pointed with "if we did nothing at all to control the spread".
No, because this was after Trump had already started doing things. There was never any "if we do nothing." Remember, he shut down travel to and from China and Biden called him a xenophobe? And then later towards election time Biden kept claiming Trump didn't react quickly enough? :laugh: Anyway, let politics stay in politics.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
The only side that was spouting that crap was right-wing sources.
Dr. Fauci and the CDC are right wing?
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
The whole point of masks (and this has never changed!) is to prevent from spread FROM YOU, TO OTHERS.
Yes, and?
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
How about every red state treating this like the common cold? Never shutting down, or, now, opening up way too early with no mask mandates?
I do find it interesting that how people see this virus tends to be the same as others in their political party. I hope someone does a serious study on that. I do find that interesting. Your language is a bit over the top, in my opinion. No one is treating it like a common cold. Every state has had shutdowns and that has never happened for the cold, but I believe I get your point even through the hyperbole. Where I live, schools opened up in August 5 days a week and there have been no major issues. I have gone to the movie theaters and not had a problem. One of my kids works at a grocery store and has been in public since day one. We have gotten the virus but it was not big deal. Other people at my work have gotten it and recovered quickly. My point is, from everything I experience I can see that the virus is not as big of a deal as others are making it. Of course, that is not to say that some have not been impacted greatly. So, there are 2 sides. One side that thinks Covid is severe enough to shut everything down and hide until it is gone. And there might be some science to back that up. And then there is the other side, those that have actual experience (the best kind of science possible) to say that we can get back to normal and still be fine overall. Neither side is denying science. Both sides are picking the science that makes them feel more comfortable. But all this talk of the other side being idiots or denying science is just nonsense.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
denies reality,
What reality? The one where we were told millions would die last year? Or the reality that masks are good, or wait, they don't help much, or wait they're essential, or wait, not so much, or wait, they are mandatory? That reality?
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
right-wing marketing
What benefit or motive does the right-wing have to be against vaccines? Or what are you suggesting the right-wing is denying? I know lot's of right-wingers and nearly all of them want the vaccine. You are claiming right-wing craziness but without some explanation you sound like a left-wing screamer with no facts. Can you expand on what you mean?
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
Deadly diseases
Such as not understanding a post you are responding to? :laugh: :laugh:
Slacker007 wrote:
You sure told him
Don't assume my gender. I am an ice cream cone today.
In steps the playground referee. :-D
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
there's a photograph on here from me. Look it up.
You're a cat??!! :laugh: :laugh: A picture of a cat is not proof. You pretend to be scientific but don't even know how to prove something. Strange.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
that's not even a legal name;
Ah yes, because you know the laws of every jurisdiction in this world. :laugh: :laugh: You do have a sense of humor. I like that. :thumbsup:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
We "know a bit"
Do you have a mouse in your pocket? :laugh: :laugh:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Imagine the same with polio.
Polio and covid cannot be compared this way.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
There's no discussion here.
Yes, I am seeing that pattern with you. My only point was that you call people who think Covid is not as bad as you do idiots, and they call you an idiot. Possibly both sides are right. :laugh:
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
There is no "both sides of the issue" with this.
Really?
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
There are the people who accept the word of experts and doctors on virus behavior and its impact on society,
That's one side.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
and then the people who deny the reality of it
And that looks like another side. :laugh:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
We need to stop idiots.
That's what people from both sides of the issue say. :laugh: :laugh:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Thank you for proving my point.
I don't think you understand your point then. If all we told people is to use parameterized queries but did not explain why, the lesson would not be learned as well. Explaining how non-parameterized queries can allow someone to hack your db is magnitudes more valuable than just telling them to use parameters.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
that's why I post under my real name, and you don't dare too.
1. You can't prove that it's your real name. 2. You can't prove this is not my real name.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Learning how to exploit a vulnerability teaches not how to code.
Sure it can. Just like SQL injection. That's hacking but we talk about it all the time. Hacking is a good way to learn how things work.
Johnny J. wrote:
That can ONLY lead to more work
Or your boss realizing you have value. :laugh:
I like hacking. That's one of the best ways to learn how things work. Do you have a question?
bye
You'd have to show the whole error. But basically it's telling you that it cannot find some code that you are trying to call.
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
(Not related at all to the farmer suffering from cornstipation).
Or the developer from CRONstipation.
MSBassSinger wrote:
nd the actual meaning of a "stand up" was as I stated
Not sure of your source but clearly different then all of our sources. Regardless, standups worked great for us. And no one actually stood. The point is, do what works for you.
I agree with most. :thumbsup:
MSBassSinger wrote:
10 - Deep-six the daily scrum "stand ups". They are not needed, and only slow down work. 11 - If you cannot get rid of the daily "stand ups", at least understand what they are. The phrase "stand up" does not refer to actually standing up
Actually, it does refer to standing up. Standing up is supposed to keep the meeting as brief as possible. When done right, especially when in the US and using offshore developers, standups are very important.