Yes, Jaurès wrote many books to explain his ideas (among them were 'Socialist History of the French Revolution', 'The New Army', 'For a secular school'...) many articles in newspapers and even created a new one, "L'Humanité" (which becomes the communist newspaper after the scission of 1924 between socialists and communists). The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread Fold with us! ¤ flickr

:-D Glad you liked it. A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Friedrich Nietzsche

That has nothing to do with the Senate, now does it?

Stan Shannon wrote: You could not mention a single real instance of the current administration, or repbublicans in general, restricting any liberty or commiting any anti-democratic act, as they are defined within the context of our political system, but I could mention many that the democrats have been responsible for. Well, I would point out the abuse of signing statements, the elimination of habeas corpus, and the domestic eavesdropping campaign for starters. That's a bold statement. What I find funny, is that y'all get stuck in a polarized world as if there were only two parties possible. Both Reps and Dems are full of sh*t. And to quote Jeffersonian democracy as if it was sacred is total bull. It was a good idea with a lot of holes, and it will take a few hundred years to build it into something worthy. So while the "left" and "right" bicker and backbite, don't mind the guy picking your pockets. There are more views than your either/or system. I say its time to flush the toilet and give this country the enema it sorely needs. So full of sh*t. Stan Shannon wrote: The left has no love of Jeffersonian democracy. Their goal is to turn the US into a European Social Welfare state. Gotta be one or the other heh? There's only room for extremism? This isn't democracy. Too much collateral damage. What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

I'm afraid I don't know how to do in 2 seperate pieces rather than 1 query with multiple conditions. Have you tried asking in the MSDN forums? I'm thinking too few people here have played with LINQ, so it might be tough getting an answer. Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: God-as-Judge, God-as-Forgiver The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Or to be safer, move to a new apartment For that matter try a new continent, I wouldn’t imagine Antarctica gets a whole lotta spam. :) I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:

Mike Mullikin wrote: Unfortunately youtube.com is blocked by our corporate firewall. :doh: I guess that's your homework for the weekend. :) Alvaro If [God] knows what we are going to do then we have no free will and are just characters in a play written by him. Without free will, morality for humans makes no sense. Without free will and morality, any sort of punishment or reward system loses any justification. Heaven and hell would be places where [God] could watch the souls he created, predestined just for eternal happiness or agony. - Mark Thomas

I played the demo. Managed to squeak through. I'm waiting for the price to drop though. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

Rob Graham wrote: As the article points out, it's not really circumventing the electoral college, since it's up to each state to determine how the electoral college votes are divided up (some already allocate proportionally, others are winner take all). I think it does so long as each state agrees to the compact because it effectively bypasses the electoral college by considering national results rather than state results. I also think is probably unconstitutional per Section 10: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay I believe this is probably something only Congress would be authorized to do and, even then, only through an amendment (since such legislation would go against the electoral college. Rob Graham wrote: They did not do that blindly, and it was debated hotly at the time. I'm not entirely convinced that they were wrong in their final decision - pure democracy would give the edge to New York and California, since a candidate could affort to tie or lose in all the rest if assured of a sufficient majority in just those two. I think it goes back to the fact that our government is a republic composed of states with their own governments. I think that's a good system, but people tend to minimize the role of the state government in national affairs. "You act like jew." -Score: 1.0 (3 votes).

Their economy was strongly based in exportation of agricultural goods and never became competitive in industrialized goods. In my opinion they never became successfull industrialized mostly because authoritarian governments created to much bureaucracy and taxation. It was the peronismo (a fascist like regime during and after WWII) and the military dictatorship from the 70s. Don't pray in my school, and I won't think in your church. Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned.

I won't repeat what they are, but I have seen discussions of several mixes that would have a reasonable chance of bringing down a plane. They all were however mixes that would be darwin candidates on the ground due to the risk of premature detonation while attemping to mix the ingrediants. However, none that I saw discussed used chemicals that could pass the open the bottle and take a drink test. GIven the backgrounds of the people doing the discussion however I don't hold that as definitive since I would expect them to be practicing opsec.

Rob Graham wrote: Both contribute more to dividing people thant to promoting any actual solutions to problems. Nope. Pay attention. O'Reilly constantly riles on "the left", while Olbermann riles on our leaders and on O'Reilly himself. O'Reilly is clearly more interested in fueling the "us vs. them" rethoric that Bush started after 9/11. Olbermann frames it as "us", the American public, vs. "them", our inept leaders and their ass-kissing talking heads. Rob Graham wrote: But then, that seems to be your cup of tea as well. No. My cup of tea is standing up for what's right for America (which is what Olbermann does), and seeking competent leaders that make decisions with our best interest at heart. Alvaro If [God] knows what we are going to do then we have no free will and are just characters in a play written by him. Without free will, morality for humans makes no sense. Without free will and morality, any sort of punishment or reward system loses any justification. Heaven and hell would be places where [God] could watch the souls he created, predestined just for eternal happiness or agony. - Mark Thomas

espeir wrote: He keeps the "scariest" stuff secret. Like the deals Cheney is making with the energy companies. :mad: The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance.

:-D

A congressman advocating the placement of them in a public building should know them. It just shows that he doesn't really know what he's voting on. BW If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. -- Steven Wright

The current leftist tyranny in the US begain with FDR during the 1930's. The right began reasserting its own tyranny in the 1980's, but the job isn't done yet. "You get that which you tolerate"

At first I thought Yahoo Serious[^] was working again, but then I got into it and it was pretty cool. - S 50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!

Michael Martin wrote: better start the whole Brian is the Messiah thing in earnest now He's not the Massiah, he's a very naughty boy Objects in mirror are closer than they appear

I'm suggesting that it could be a supporting tool problem (data base, or ASP) that causes the misplaced forum post bug. Perhaps replacing the tool in the new version will help fix the problem, whereas coding around it in the current environment simply isn't cost effective. Note: The following comment does not apply to your original post, Jeremy. My objection to the raft of complaints posted lately stems more from the note of entitlement they seem to include. People act like The Code Project is a public utility from which they have a God-given right to a certain level of service. They forget that it is a self-supporting business proposition, from which I doubt Mr. Maunder and friends make sufficient profit to compensate them for putting up with all the bitching. Software Zen: delete this; Fold With Us![^]