You're trying to violate the security of a network that is designed to prevent you from accessing it. There's probably a good reason for that. The "right" way to do this is to establish trust relationships between the two domains, but your admin has chosen not to do so. It may be that, though it is inconvenient for you, the best choice for your organization is to continue using the tedious method. Another choice might be to establish an account in the remote domain for yourself that includes transferring files into the domain from outside. Remote Access priveleges can be established that will allow you to log on to the other domain from the local and make transfers oer that connection. "A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

To crush our enemies, see them driven before us, and to hear the lamentations of their women. Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

Have a small 'droid display it as a hologram... but only part of it at first, to catch their curiosity. :cool:

You could just do something along the lines of using the PrintDocument class in your app for adhoc reporting. If not, there are plenty of free reporting tools out there, this google search on freeware reporting tools for .net[^] turned up a few good ones. Report Sharp Shooter Express is a nice one. "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

Could you give some citations on this? My understanding was that an N qbit QC could crack any Nbit cipher by trying to decrypt with all 2^N possible keys simultaneously. Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

Roger Wright wrote: You're still going to have a hell of a time getting a computer to calculate a number that larg I beg to differ, it does not take that long. I made the calculations (I am only reporting the digit count of the various values, but I can report the actual values if desired): 14.984 msec to calculate (14,984 seconds for 1000 loops). Chars in 10^56 = 57 Chars in 136*10^56 (=V1) = 63 Chars in 10^19707 = 19708 Chars in 236*10^19707 (=V2) = 19714 Chars in (V2-V1) = 19714 Chars in quotient of (V2-V1)/V1 = 19652 Chars in remainder of (V2-V1)/V1 = 63 Chars in quotient of V2/V1 = 19652 Chars in remainder of V2/V1 = 63 Dave Augustine.

Never mind. Found it lol. Under Layouts, click "Repeat Header Rows". But before clicking it, highlight the header row. :-D It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.

We could tell you anything, and we'd be right. Based on the subject line, you suck as a coder. "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

i think it's just O(n). see http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~vernon/cs367/notes/3.COMPLEXITY.html[^]

Original post was a bit off. Seems like no one knows for sure if the Collatz Conjecture does. I remember my algorithms teacher talking about it. If there were to be a program that you could just feed in a code snippet and it returns whatever the Big O is for the code snippet, one would have to make the assumption the code does terminate and is in simple form. This would have to lead into defining what is actually simple? "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

As far as the importance of math courses, as has already been said, it really depends on what type of programming you do. Right now I'm doing a mix of interfacing with hardware, writing standalone PC apps, and some SQL. Some of this requires some basic integrals and derivatives, some simple arithmetic, some virtually no math (save the occasionally i++ counter in a for loop :) ) I was fine at Calc when I took the classes, but that was 4 years ago...I never really used it again until after I graduated. Fortunately I have notes, textbooks, and forums to refer to ;P Ian Uy wrote: The logical thing that I would do is run both algorithms in the same machine and get the total running time then benchmark the two algorithms. Chris Austin wrote: This would get you fired or put on code maintenance at a lot of places I've worked at. I'm not trying to be harsh... I would agree with Chris on this one. Algorithm complexity is extremely important when you're concerned about performance. <rant> This is just a general rant here, not intended to insult anyone, I just been needing to get this out. One of my pet peeves when it comes to programming is people who just hack out code without thinking it through. IMHO, any decent team of software engineers will spend a good bit of time designing their app before they start writing code. Code should not be written on the fly to see if it works. You should know it will do what you expect it to do when you write it. If you need to, write some pseudocode on paper or a whiteboard to work out the ideas. Draw a bunch of pretty pictures to illustrate how you expect different objects in your code to relate to each other. I've a good bit of experience with this already in my first 6 months on the job out of college, not to mention my Senior Design project. We spent a good month just designing our program structure before we wrote a single line of code. And then the first week of "coding" was actually just filling in a whole bunch of comments to outline what we'd be doing. The last month and a half was spent coding, testing, and debugging. We knew exactly what we were trying to do and how we wanted to do it once we started coding. OK I'm done now :-D Sorry for the random jabber there, I just had to get that out. </rant>

Yeah, I'd probably suggest a web service of sorts for that. Keeping it as simple as possible is always the best thing to do, especially with mobile devices. You could hit the server directly rather than through a web service if you were so inclined as well. I haven't used the Syetem.Net namespace much on desktops or mobile devices, but I suspect it would be a bit easier code wise to request it through a web service. ------------------------ Luke Lovegrove ------------------------

My gut feel is that your effective keyspace will be each contiguous block of text removed. As the plaintext is fairly predictable then the keyspace is reduced considerably. Once the first block is recovered, then the others will fall in sequence. If you are removing random characters then your effective keyspace is probably around 3 or 4 bit if the plaintext is a written language. I would, as always, recommend using a standard method of protecting your data if security is important. Mark Churchill Director, Dunn & Churchill Pty Ltd Free Download: Diamond Binding: The simple, powerful, reliable, and effective data layer toolkit for Visual Studio. Alpha release: Entanglar: Transparant multiplayer framework for .Net games.

When you create the application.. make sure you created a windows smart device NOT a windows application..

Perhaps because the system is unable to allocate an array that large. Don't read the entire file at once, there is no reason to have all the data in memory at the same time. Create a buffer and read only a small part of the file each time. Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.

True, << and >> means Left Shift and Right Shift. But when done in a specific way, it can be "tricked" to do Circular shifts. :) It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.

As I said, it depends what your goal is. If this metric is useful for you, go for it.

You can use smart device cab project under setup and deployment project type. Hope this will help you. regards Parasmani Swamy

Thank you. I'll take additional readings regarding Microsoft Report. It is said that the most complex structures built by mankind are software systems. This is not generally appreciated because most people cannot see them. Maybe that's a good thing because if we saw them as buildings, we'd deem many of them unsafe.