It does if you search more deeply. Are you familiar with the word "review" ? "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

Hi Jgrogan, Check this vm converters. Hope it will be helpful for you. http://www.microsoft.com/en-pk/download/details.aspx?id=42497[^] https://www.vmware.com/support/converter/doc/conv_sa_551_rel_notes.html[^]

Did you read this[^]? One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.

just Google it,you can see lot of resources or Checkout msdn or also there are lot of free ebooks available something like OReilly publication which i feel very gud.

Ray Cassick wrote: I just never makes sense to me to store the actual images or documents in the DB itself since it really provides you nothing in the way of performance or search capabilities and I think really adds more weight to your DB than is needed. The link I posted does show a performance difference. Additionally a factor could be access control, especially when users are managed as data versus actual db users or system users.

Fusion will import Parallels VMs, here's a video showing how: clickety[^] --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ "That's what's great about doing user interface work. No matter what you do, people will say that what you did was idiotic." -- Raymond Chen

If you have your report active in a tab, you should have a Report menu item. You have to use that to add sources to the particular report. Then you should have them as choices when you put components down on the report. If you didn't know already, you have to pass data in as a generic list even if there's only one object that you're working with. And be warned that the editor is NOT NICE when it comes to revising the report, I can't tell you how many times I've had to manually edit the rdlc file to fix something that the automation broke. Scott P “It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.” -Edsger Dijkstra

Yeah - I was staring at it for 2 minutes before I realised where the difference was :)

I wouldn't bother with detaching/reattaching; just attach it as usual and leave it.

jgrogan wrote: are you suggesting that I put the code from the designer script into my own script and simply call the functions from the designer script? No, leave them as they are. "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

jgrogan wrote: Can you outline some of the more common issues resulting in slower compiled VB6 code? You mean some of the millions of possibilities?? Seriously, it comes down to the quality of the code and exactly what it's doing. You also might have too much in the way of expectations on how fast the code should run compared to the VBA version. You might get 25% out of the VB6 version, if you're lucky. There are sections that will run faster, but this is limited to stuff that does NOT include database access, math operations, and COM objects, interprocess communication, among others. VBA isn't interpreted as much as you may think. It still gets compiled, but on a method by method basis when it's needed. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic      2006, 2007

You won't find examples because they are not needed. All DLLs created by VB (at least up to version 6) are COM/ActiveX objects.

Thanks Dave. I hadn't thought of that angle. I'll give your suggestion a go. John.