puromtec1 wrote: *******output: Harmonica bool fun = (TripType.Camping.Contains("Harmonica" + "Beer")) ? true : false; Trollslayer wrote: Meetings - where minutes are taken and hours are lost.

Yes, I did some development with the 2003 version, back when the C++/CLI syntax was a little odd. Management wants C# solutions, so that's where I am right now. I have Googled some of the commercial libraries out there but have no real world experience with them.... ............................. Two words you don't ever want to hear. "Fix bayonets" US Marine Corps When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not our friend.

Available in yellow? The tigress is here :-D

You could use Susie Linux - it comes with Mono built in.

I was running it for a couple of days. The biggest improvement I noticed was with stepping though the code while debugging. Before the update it would sometimes take up to a second to step through each line, now it is a more reasonable response time. The only issue I had was I could no longer create Web Application Project as I received the following error: Error: this template attempted to load an untrusted component 'Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.Application, Version=8.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35'. For more information on this problem and how to enable this template, please see documentation on Customizing Project Templates. But I found a solution to this posted on ScottGu's Blog: This is caused by a bug with the SP1 Beta setup. You can fix this with the SP1 Beta by closing VS 2005, and then open up the "Visual Studio 2005 Command Prompt" (there is an icon for it in your Start Menu->Visual Studio 2005->Visual Studio Tools folder), and run this command from within it: devenv.exe /InstallVSTemplates This will correctly re-configure the add item templates and make everything work fine.

Frank Kerrigan wrote: Please test first with a test table. Test? I think you mean test in Production! (is it Friday yet?) :) I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:

These samples were written for the early betas of VS 2005. Get the up-to-date version from MSDN[^]. -- I've killed again, haven't I?

Try the MS CLR Profiler, or the ANTS Profiler trial :)** How xacc.ide transforms text to colored words on the screen Intel PentuimM (aka Centrino) undervolting **

www.zoomproxy.com[^] http://anonymouse.org/anonwww.html[^] www.secure-tunnel.com[^] www.proxy4free.com[^] http://www.guardster.com/subscription/proxy_free.php[^] http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/cgi-proxy.htm[^] http://proxy.org/cgi_proxies.shtml[^]

Robert M Greene wrote: Hopefully not too expensive, say, under 200-300 bucks range. I don't think I can help you... though I got mine for $350, the unit normally costs more than that (I got an introduction discount when it came out). I use the Garmin 60c[^] _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

The UltraTree has support for multi-column nodes. That will provide the functionality of the TreeListView and more. Josh

I am in USA and price is aroung $900 after rebates. I am a strong AMD fan. I have bought/assembled more than 10 AMD based machines, all more reliable, cheaper and faster than comparatively priced Intel machines b/c I get to choose components :) Adnan Siddiqi wrote: i dont knw why dont ifeel to trust on AMD Read up on Toms Hardware and Anandtech. Farhan Noor Qureshi if (this == this) thow this; -- modified at 23:35 Monday 12th December, 2005

I doubt it. I think he wants a reference to *each and every* object that his program creates. AFAIK, there's no way to do this. Cheers, Vikram.

It could be much more easy if you go ahead with XSL sort .

> I wish I could use VS C++ 2005 compiler for managed code, so I could manage the memory myself, sigh Don't worry. With experience you will slowly begin appreciate the fact that the computer can manage memory better at runtime than you think can at compile time. Matt Gerrans

I was concerned with the availability of obsolete functions or methods from one version of the CLR to another. With a CLR version compile time symbol definition I hoped to avoid all those obsolete methods messages. I will have to perform run-time detection of the CLR, but was hoping to use a ConditionalAttribute with the CLR version for source I might distribute that would work on 1.1 or 2.0 of the CLR. Oh well. ............................. There's nothing like the sound of incoming rifle and mortar rounds to cure the blues. No matter how down you are, you take an active and immediate interest in life. Fiat justitia, et ruat cælum