See http://www.engadget.com/2014/09/18/nvidia-proves-moon-landing/

win /386 is how we used to roll :)

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Hmm sounds like a perfect job for Linux. Have you ever considered using Linux?

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

But then there will be a drop of about 1.4 volts (2* 0.7V) (assuming silicon diodes) across the bridge rectifier so a 3V battery will be as good as a 1.6 V battery only. You need something better than this (may be based on this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-dropout_regulator[^])

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

MDL=>Moshu wrote:

"beter shut up and leave the impression that you're stupid, than talk and remove all doubt!!!"

He who asks a question is a fool for a minute; he who does not, remains a fool forever.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

modified on Monday, May 31, 2010 11:57 PM

Don't you mean "Dilbert taught COBOL"?

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Thanks!

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Ok done! Please let me know if its working for you now.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Thanks! I will fix it as soon as I get some time. Though I have to say that IE leaves a lot to be desired when talking about supporting JS development. I will try and see if I can get a handle on the problem using Firebug-lite.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Oops! Forgot all about IE! Guess I will never make a good web developer :) Will fix that ASAP. Though if you are interested please try it out in Firefox (v3).

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Check this[^] out and see if you find it useful.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

You absolutely need to try sequoia view

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

ghard68 wrote:

Is it just the benefit, nobody else sees my shelve ? Or minor adminstativ overhead?

Its both.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Che Mass wrote:

Team foundation (too much - and HOW MUCH???)

Of all the suggested alternatives VSTS (Visual studio team system) is probably the most hassle free, feature complete (and probably most expensive too). I have been using it for quite some time now (in a team of 4 to 6 devs) and it has been smooth sailing ever since. Support for Branching and merging is excellent too. My favourite feature in VSTS is the ability to shelve what you are doing now and start working from scratch with the version on the source control without losing the current changes (hope this makes sense). Cheers, SDX2000.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Even for 00?

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

w00t! We now have at least three good reasons for writing for CP... 1. Its a good learning experience! 2. Earn goodwill by helping others. 3. Its a good way of showcasing your talents.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Christian Graus wrote:

The idea that some classification on this website should be your sole motivation is the reason so many people try to answer questions they cannot in a vain attempt to gain CPMVP status.

Just FYI I have never posted any message to gain CPMVP. Like Rajesh said I have barely posted enough messages to show that I have been an active CPian over the years. Though I can assure you that I have been an active "browser". I am an introvert by nature and don't usually have much to say on most occasions, the 40 odd posts in 3.5 years are a reflection of this.

Christian Graus wrote:

Write to learn, and to help, and accept whatever level you end up with.

A noble goal indeed, worthy of pursuit.

Then why have them? Let's get rid of this system.

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

Zoltan Balazs wrote:

There are other reasons for publishing an article than some obscure membership level.

Agreed but I guess it wont hurt if one gets a membership level promotion!

Zoltan Balazs wrote:

Also there is a Suggestions/Site bugs forum for these questions.

Ok thanks for the info but I think its too late now, cross posting is an offense here unless you can tell me how to move my post from one forum to another! (Simply deleting my post and re-posting it will not work since other posts need to be moved too)

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo

I have been a CPian for more than three and a half years now and I am tired of being tagged as a "browser". I think producing an article suitable for code project will prove to be a time consuming affair (I am a bit of a perfectionist). This is one reason why in spite of many article ideas I have desisted from writing one. I think its high time now that I wrote a few articles but where's the incentive? My point being I already have a silver rating (thanks for that) and I wont get to gold until I write 15 articles at the very least! Consider the CP member classification rules... 1) By number of articles: 1-4 articles posted = Bronze. 5A-14 articles = Silver. 15-24 articles = Gold. 25+ articles = Platinum. 2) Each 500 messages posted adds one level, and if a member has posted a message then each year of membership adds 1 level until the member hits Silver. IMHO I think the classification should depend on a linear combination of the following factors... 1) Period of membership 2) Number of messages posted 3) Number of articles written For example if you are already silver and then write 5 articles, you qualify as gold! What do you think?

The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec-sec - Marcus Dolengo