JavaScript's native date object does that. const date = new Date(Date.parse('2022-09-04T00:00:00')); console.log(date.toLocaleString()); I would suggest putting a Z at the end of the ISO input date though, just to make it explicit that it's in UTC. const date = new Date(Date.parse('2022-09-04T00:00:00Z')); console.log(date.toLocaleString()); Otherwise, JavaScript will assume the input is in the local time zone. Jeremy Falcon

. "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

Simon_Whale wrote: list all the exceptions that either the code catches or raises so that I can do a review That process would need to find that those in all of the libraries that you use also. Simon_Whale wrote: reason for the review is the result of a pen test, Probably because you have an API and you are returning the exception stack trace as part of the API error handling. The solution to that is the following 1. Catch all exceptions so "catch(Exception e)" in your API layer. 2. Log the exception. You should of course already be doing this. 3. Return an error result from the API. Do not return the exception. Probably 500. But over time you can differentiate this in the error handling code. I would suggest that you also create an id and log that as well and return that as part of the error message. That way you can track an error reported from a caller back to the specific log entry. You can use a GUID but it is going to be more user friendly, especially if a UI is involved, if you create a simple id. It can rotate over time because the context of the error (when reported) is enough to localize in the logs.

It can be done, a teammate of mine migrated an old WebForms app to use it Director of Transmogrification Services Shinobi of Query Language Master of Yoda Conditional

You're welcome, and happens to us all :D Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

Thanks Rich worked a treat I was able to resolve the issue Thanks Simon Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON

Richard, Thanks for this and apologies that I have taken so long to respond, had to tweak your solution slightly to make it work using (var formData = new MultipartFormDataContent()) { Task responseMessage = null; using (var stream = File.OpenRead(pdf)) { HttpContent fileStreamContent = new StreamContent(stream); fileStreamContent.Headers.ContentDisposition = new System.Net.Http.Headers.ContentDispositionHeaderValue("form-data") { Name = "DigitalPCN", FileName = Path.GetFileName(fine.FileName) }; fileStreamContent.Headers.ContentType = new System.Net.Http.Headers.MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/pdf"); formData.Add(fileStreamContent); responseMessage = base.PostAsync(new Uri(@"https://localhost:44349/api/Controller/Method"), formData, token); responseMessage.Wait(); } return responseMessage.Result; } Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON

Hi, as others already noted, every second call to MethodCall(param1, param2, param3), I mean the ones after the question marks, is likely to return true, as you just have tested for true (that is what the question mark does). I say likely, it might be ugly code that creates or uses nasty side effects. If so, what follows needs some adjusting. it seems all your params have the same type, and all your someIntValues have different values, so I would suggest you: 1. stuff all the params in an array "paramsArray" 2. stuff all the someIntValues in an array "someIntValuesArray" 3. modify your MethodCall() to accept paramsArray and return an integer, being the first index in the paramsArray for which the original MethodCall() did return true; this basically means surrounding existing code with a for loop, adjusting the params (now array elements); also return a special value if no match found, say -1. 4. then simply do int index=MethodCall(paramsArray); if (index>=0) outcome=AnotherMethod(true, someIntValuesArray[index]); :) Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

You're welcome :) Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

dandy72 wrote: to make you crave it and then buy more. Yeah - because they need to work at it to make you want more bacon. :doh: I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended. I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended. Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like. Dave

Thanks Mycroft. it makes sense to look at an MVVM framework first, as I knew that this was a large part of the WPF concept that I would need to understand. Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON

So now we have a hopped up crack head croc wandering the coastline. I call bullshit - I am 1 beach away from there and it was not in the local news or the national news nor is it on the radio. Croc and shark attacks ALWAYS make the national news! Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

Final kick applied to the two surviving messages. "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

Whilst perusing Google street view at the house I rented two years ago, I came across a view of a local man I knew standing facing a white-washed wall, his back to the street; pretty clear he was relieving himself. I debated whether to tell him that he had become immortal, but decided against it. «There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008

Not now thanks :thumbsup: Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON

Can you please forward this to me? chris at codeproject.com. Thanks mate. cheers Chris Maunder

If they do they hide it well! :)

It's a darn fine piece of photoshopping. Look at the way the crease runs through the N. Magnificent work! I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

The fact it's saying that Jibesh edited the question 3 and a bit hours ago is a bug ... reported here at some time. The update was actually Solution 8 being added ... subsequently removed (either voluntarily or due to 3 reports - I don't know which) Trouble is if we lock down questions we're turning into SO. Sometimes (not often granted) there are sensible additions that can be made to older questions. We can't even use the "has an accepted answer" - I've seen plenty of accepted answers that are just downright wrong, and there are several members who will just hit "Accepted" because someone has responded (and then ask no end of follow up questions :sigh: ) [EDIT - Also see Sean's 5 pennorth on it ... Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^]