Your machine would look like a large USB hub.

:beer:

I did FA T on an Aeroplane, for heaven's sake. 'r' don't work in my keyboard often, sorry. Bill did something close I guess[^]

:beer:

I know It's "Donald Kicks Arse" in French.

:beer:

I think "Yoga pants" would really discourage an obese from giving a try at Yoga. And I can see Microsoft is pretty determined to attract users this time.

:beer:

35 years ago, I was using this[^] . Time really flies.

:beer:

With the extravagant introduction he started with, I thought a C-3PO like thing would fall down from the chimney and start cooking for him in the kitchen. That would have been really "AWESOME". Not just for a piece of speech-recognition code.

:beer:

Oh the cave man's ipad. :-D These looked very "electronic". I loved the one I had for few months.

:beer:

:) Yup that's true. When the mouse came into use, some usability enthusiasts tried scribbling "A" "B" "C" with their mouse when then could easily type it with the keyboard. The same thing happened with the stylus , my ex-boss tried so hard to show off with a stylus over his pocket PC. The hand recognition system never believed it's a human writing over the screen there. After years of pointless effort, he restored back to keypad. I saw some dumb usage of Intel perc as well. But I just masked my giggle inside just to stay away from discouraging them, except @ a guy that shouted "AWESOME" in the kitchen. :doh:

:beer:

You own sheeps? Mates here said so.

:beer:

No[^] Why does this guy scream "AWESOME" quite often in his kitchen? :confused: Just reminds me of the kids that try to emulate stylish weather reporters in TV channels. All gestures, misplaced. But the difference, they look very cute.

:beer:

You did speak up.:thumbsup:

:beer:

Close your eyes, Shut down your thoughts, Now listen at the spot between your eyebrows and turn the memory coil on. Watch yourself going back deep into your previous birth memory records. YOU ARE THE COMMAND LINE GUY THAT RESISTED MOUSE!. ;P Now watch this.[^]

:beer:

:sheep: :bah: :bhaa: :baa: :bargh!: :sodo: Damn nothing seem to work for me as well :sigh:

:beer:

May be bushy ones. 1970s like.

:beer:

Check here to get the actual joke[^]

:beer:

I hate it when I have to work with .NET 1.1, since the Singleton pattern wasn't designed until .NET 2.0.

:beer:

Once upon a time, a guy asked a girl 'Will you marry me?'The girl said, 'NO!'And the guy lived happily ever after and rode motorcycles and watched sport on a big screen TV, went fishing and surfing, and played golf a lot, and drank beer and scotch and had tons of money in the bank and left the toilet seat up and farted whenever he wanted.

:beer:

Thanks for the reply Richard. I'm trying to dig a little deep into it but most of the links show up a blunt high level Block diagrams , explaining the stacks in the framework. I need to a pointer to understand low level details of how CLR is invoked to deal managed Applications. Anywhere you can point me to? I want to know: When I execute a managed App, how does the OS route the exe to the CLR? Or CLR is mapped to every process? If CLR hosts all the managed Apps as domains? then how does it over ride 4GB limit per process in a 32bit system?

:beer:

Thanks for the reply mate. I'm trying to look into the internals of managed world. The document says "CLR is hosted"? Does that mean CLR is per process stuff? is it not system wide?

:beer:

Hi, I would like to know: 1.what happens when you add a reference to a Class library in dotnet. 2.Is it something like a "implicit" linking in C++? 3.Can I make the library statically link to the exe? 4.And does the dll in dotnet internally have implementation for DLLAttach, Detach?

:beer: