:zzz:
mark merrens wrote:
Excuse my tardy response.
Eh!? Whaa!? :confused: Oh! It's you. Scaring an old man like that.
mark merrens wrote:
of which Palestine was not one.
Arabs, indigenous Jews, Zionist immigrants, and others, held title to land under the Ottoman Empire. Where this land formed part of Palestine, run by the British under the 1922 Mandate, these titles were recognised. The political entities that existed over 100 years ago, whether called Palaestina, Filistine, Syria, or Orpington South, were thus recognised by all parties. Arabs, indigenous Jews, Zionist immigrants, and others, purchased title to land in Palestine, under the British. The political entity of Palestine was thus recognised by all parties. (Jews and Arabs alike held passports describing them as citizens of Palestine. Palestine postage stamps were in use. So the rest of the world also recognised Palestine as a political entity.) So, did Israel refuse to recognise the legitimacy of title to land of the indigenous Jews and Zionists? Of course not. Therefore, to that extent, Israel recognised Palestine, and the Ottoman Provinces, as a political entity.
mark merrens wrote:
Not their land so nothing to give back.
Legally, it was. But to the victor, the spoils. Israel may do as it likes.
mark merrens wrote:
Besides, you must realise that will never happen.
Willingly, no. But, never? Who knows? This show has been running since OT times.
mark merrens wrote:
Given that is the case make peace and move on.
50 years ago, before Prime Minister Wilson started the last round of 'troubles', an Irish guy explained that he hated me. Nothing personal, he assured me. I was, apparently, a good colleague to work with. It was merely because I was British.
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon