Science advice
-
I haven't read the link yet, but I think it's very difficult to pick one thing. Discovery did this series with Bill Nye the Science Guy of the Top 100 Discoveries in several fields including biology, chemistry, physics, earth science, etc. Then they did a top 10 from the different shows. if i had to narrow it to one thing, I would say Genetics. It's a broad topic but there is so much about it that is fascinating.
_________________________________________________________________ Dick Cheney looks like a high school calculus teacher with persistent heartburn.
Well thankfully the question was interpreted not as "what one field" but as "one underpinning of science in general" so most of the answers are along the lines of finding the truth, knowing that ultimately there is more, that hard graft is the basis, curiosity is important, that anyone can try and so on.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Percival Watson wrote:
What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]
That without God, there would be no science. Have at it, folks! Maybe someone will mark this as spam or abuse. :-D Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithI wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Well, the sequencing around this post has gotten really screwed up. What's going on Chris?
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
Cooking is not a science.
Actually, there's a lot of science surrounding cooking. For example: Did you know that the gluten in cornflower cause liquid to bind, because molecules get stuck in the long strings formed by the gluten molecules? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluten[^] There's a program on discovery science that shows a lot of interesting stuff about cooking.
WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson
-
Percival Watson wrote:
What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]
That without God, there would be no science. Have at it, folks! Maybe someone will mark this as spam or abuse. :-D Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithSo what's your point? That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen. Way below your usual standard. D-
Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder
-
Well, the sequencing around this post has gotten really screwed up. What's going on Chris?
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.Pete O`Hanlon wrote:
this post has gotten really
Having used the g-word, do you still expect that Chris will help you?
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Science removes the con from your conscience.
That is SO excellent! Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Percival Watson wrote:
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
That's a very interesting question, in what would constitute "conclusive". But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy. :) Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
Pete O`Hanlon wrote:
this post has gotten really
Having used the g-word, do you still expect that Chris will help you?
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
Having used the g-word
I believe in a higher power. Well, doesn't Chris qualify as a higher power?:-D
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Percival Watson wrote:
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
No. People's capacity for self delusion is unlimited. No matter what is discovered, there will be people that won't believe it. This is why there are people who believe that UFOs are regularly visiting Earth just to mess with hicks, that the US never went to the moon and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.
-
Percival Watson wrote:
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
That's a very interesting question, in what would constitute "conclusive". But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy. :) Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithMarc Clifton wrote:
But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy
Are you being genuine or are you hinting that science is on a wild goose chase and the answer is God? I didn't take you for the type who thinks God micromanages the universe. I took you more for the type that thinks God create the universe and its rules and then let it run. In the latter dark matter and dark energy may exist and be found by science. In the former, not.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Percival Watson wrote:
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
No. People's capacity for self delusion is unlimited. No matter what is discovered, there will be people that won't believe it. This is why there are people who believe that UFOs are regularly visiting Earth just to mess with hicks, that the US never went to the moon and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Wjousts wrote:
and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Sadly all the evidence shows the current American Idol had no evidence of becoming it.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
Having used the g-word
I believe in a higher power. Well, doesn't Chris qualify as a higher power?:-D
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.Do you want high power, chew a high tension power line. :-D
-- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.
-
Marc Clifton wrote:
But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy
Are you being genuine or are you hinting that science is on a wild goose chase and the answer is God? I didn't take you for the type who thinks God micromanages the universe. I took you more for the type that thinks God create the universe and its rules and then let it run. In the latter dark matter and dark energy may exist and be found by science. In the former, not.
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Percival Watson wrote:
Are you being genuine or are you hinting that science is on a wild goose chase and the answer is God?
No, I was being genuine. There absolutely is a physical explanation for dark matter and dark energy. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
So what's your point? That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen. Way below your usual standard. D-
Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder
Andy Brummer wrote:
That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen.
I had no intention of stirring up a debate. I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.
Andy Brummer wrote:
Way below your usual standard. D-
I'm full of surprises. :) Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
Percival Watson wrote:
What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]
That without God, there would be no science. Have at it, folks! Maybe someone will mark this as spam or abuse. :-D Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithMarc Clifton wrote:
without God, there would be no science.
Amen :) I find it fascinating that some feel that God should somehow be able to be described or quantified by that which He created. It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read
-
What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]
regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
That Paul = Percival?;P
-
Percival Watson wrote:
I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.
No. People's capacity for self delusion is unlimited. No matter what is discovered, there will be people that won't believe it. This is why there are people who believe that UFOs are regularly visiting Earth just to mess with hicks, that the US never went to the moon and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Wjousts wrote:
that the US never went to the moon
Fixed that for ya...
---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums
-
Andy Brummer wrote:
That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen.
I had no intention of stirring up a debate. I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.
Andy Brummer wrote:
Way below your usual standard. D-
I'm full of surprises. :) Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithMarc Clifton wrote:
I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.
You bastard! :rolleyes:
---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums
-
Marc Clifton wrote:
without God, there would be no science.
Amen :) I find it fascinating that some feel that God should somehow be able to be described or quantified by that which He created. It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read
Gary Kirkham wrote:
It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.
That's an interesting way of looking at it, Gary. I'll have to remember that one, thanks.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango