Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Science advice

Science advice

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionhtmlcom
43 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

    Pete O`Hanlon wrote:

    this post has gotten really

    Having used the g-word, do you still expect that Chris will help you?

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Pete OHanlon
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:

    Having used the g-word

    I believe in a higher power. Well, doesn't Chris qualify as a higher power?:-D

    the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
    Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Watson

      I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.

      regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa

      Shog9 wrote:

      I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

      W Offline
      W Offline
      Wjousts
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      Percival Watson wrote:

      I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.

      No. People's capacity for self delusion is unlimited. No matter what is discovered, there will be people that won't believe it. This is why there are people who believe that UFOs are regularly visiting Earth just to mess with hicks, that the US never went to the moon and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.

      P S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Percival Watson wrote:

        I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.

        That's a very interesting question, in what would constitute "conclusive". But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy. :) Marc

        Thyme In The Country

        People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
        There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
        People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Paul Watson
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        Marc Clifton wrote:

        But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy

        Are you being genuine or are you hinting that science is on a wild goose chase and the answer is God? I didn't take you for the type who thinks God micromanages the universe. I took you more for the type that thinks God create the universe and its rules and then let it run. In the latter dark matter and dark energy may exist and be found by science. In the former, not.

        regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa

        Shog9 wrote:

        I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W Wjousts

          Percival Watson wrote:

          I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.

          No. People's capacity for self delusion is unlimited. No matter what is discovered, there will be people that won't believe it. This is why there are people who believe that UFOs are regularly visiting Earth just to mess with hicks, that the US never went to the moon and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Watson
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          Wjousts wrote:

          and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.

          Sadly all the evidence shows the current American Idol had no evidence of becoming it.

          regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa

          Shog9 wrote:

          I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Pete OHanlon

            Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:

            Having used the g-word

            I believe in a higher power. Well, doesn't Chris qualify as a higher power?:-D

            the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            CastorTiu
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            Do you want high power, chew a high tension power line. :-D

            -- If you think the chess rules are not fair, first beat Anand, Kasparov and Karpov then you can change them. Moral is, don't question the work of others if you don't know the reason why they did it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Watson

              Marc Clifton wrote:

              But for now, I'll sit back and enjoy watching science figure out things like dark matter and dark energy

              Are you being genuine or are you hinting that science is on a wild goose chase and the answer is God? I didn't take you for the type who thinks God micromanages the universe. I took you more for the type that thinks God create the universe and its rules and then let it run. In the latter dark matter and dark energy may exist and be found by science. In the former, not.

              regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa

              Shog9 wrote:

              I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Marc Clifton
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              Percival Watson wrote:

              Are you being genuine or are you hinting that science is on a wild goose chase and the answer is God?

              No, I was being genuine. There absolutely is a physical explanation for dark matter and dark energy. Marc

              Thyme In The Country

              People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
              There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
              People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Andy Brummer

                So what's your point? That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen. Way below your usual standard. D-

                Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Marc Clifton
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                Andy Brummer wrote:

                That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen.

                I had no intention of stirring up a debate. I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.

                Andy Brummer wrote:

                Way below your usual standard. D-

                I'm full of surprises. :) Marc

                Thyme In The Country

                People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                S A 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • M Marc Clifton

                  Percival Watson wrote:

                  What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]

                  That without God, there would be no science. Have at it, folks! Maybe someone will mark this as spam or abuse. :-D Marc

                  Thyme In The Country

                  People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                  There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                  People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gary Kirkham
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  Marc Clifton wrote:

                  without God, there would be no science.

                  Amen :) I find it fascinating that some feel that God should somehow be able to be described or quantified by that which He created. It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.

                  Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]

                    regards, Percival Watson Ireland & South Africa

                    Shog9 wrote:

                    I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    code frog 0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    That Paul = Percival?;P

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W Wjousts

                      Percival Watson wrote:

                      I wonder if science will ever find a proof that is conclusive on God, one that every rational being will accept.

                      No. People's capacity for self delusion is unlimited. No matter what is discovered, there will be people that won't believe it. This is why there are people who believe that UFOs are regularly visiting Earth just to mess with hicks, that the US never went to the moon and that they are the next American Idol, despite all evidence to the contrary.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Shog9 0
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      Wjousts wrote:

                      that the US never went to the moon

                      Fixed that for ya...

                      ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Marc Clifton

                        Andy Brummer wrote:

                        That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen.

                        I had no intention of stirring up a debate. I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.

                        Andy Brummer wrote:

                        Way below your usual standard. D-

                        I'm full of surprises. :) Marc

                        Thyme In The Country

                        People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                        There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                        People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Shog9 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        Marc Clifton wrote:

                        I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.

                        You bastard! :rolleyes:

                        ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gary Kirkham

                          Marc Clifton wrote:

                          without God, there would be no science.

                          Amen :) I find it fascinating that some feel that God should somehow be able to be described or quantified by that which He created. It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.

                          Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Judah Gabriel Himango
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          Gary Kirkham wrote:

                          It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.

                          That's an interesting way of looking at it, Gary. I'll have to remember that one, thanks.

                          Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                            Gary Kirkham wrote:

                            It's kind of like trying to use a shadow to describe the inner depths of that which cast it.

                            That's an interesting way of looking at it, Gary. I'll have to remember that one, thanks.

                            Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gary Kirkham
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            You're welcome.

                            Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Marc Clifton

                              Andy Brummer wrote:

                              That's got to be the most Milquetoast attempt at stirring up some kind of religion vs science debate/flame I've seen.

                              I had no intention of stirring up a debate. I was just making a point, with regards to my opinion on the matter.

                              Andy Brummer wrote:

                              Way below your usual standard. D-

                              I'm full of surprises. :) Marc

                              Thyme In The Country

                              People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                              There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                              People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Andy Brummer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              Marc Clifton wrote:

                              I was just making a point

                              Again, what was the point, because I totally missed it. ;P Keep in mind that I only care about science the process, not popular culture's take on something most people don't understand.

                              Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Marc Clifton

                                Percival Watson wrote:

                                What is the one thing everyone should learn about science?[^]

                                That without God, there would be no science. Have at it, folks! Maybe someone will mark this as spam or abuse. :-D Marc

                                Thyme In The Country

                                People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                                There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                                People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Chris Maunder
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                Many seem to feel that scientists are Godless atheists with no soul. Many, many scientists see their work as bringing them closer to God - to being able to see more of His creation, to understand it at a deeper level that would otherwise be possible. Science is beautiful - it's art. You think you do well when you're in the zone coding for 16 hrs a day? Imagine focusing on a single equation, a single molecule or a single cellular structure for 20 years. Now that is focus, is passion. Is love.

                                cheers, Chris Maunder

                                CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Pete OHanlon

                                  Well, the sequencing around this post has gotten really screwed up. What's going on Chris?

                                  the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                                  Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Chris Maunder
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  Pete O`Hanlon wrote:

                                  Well, the sequencing around this post has become really screwed up

                                  Just a little secret here: I actually have a big button on my screen that says "fix up forums". Sometimes I use that power for good. Sometimes for bad. I am fickle.

                                  cheers, Chris Maunder

                                  CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Shog9 0

                                    Wjousts wrote:

                                    that the US never went to the moon

                                    Fixed that for ya...

                                    ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    Wjousts
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    Shog9 wrote:

                                    Fixed that for ya...

                                    I rest my case...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                                      Cooking is not a science.

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      RoswellNX
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #36

                                      PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                                      Cooking is not a science.

                                      Depends on what you cook...cooking meth is a bit more scientific, since you need to know some chemistry to do it right. Otherwise you end up with a very impure product. Roswell

                                      "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
                                      Antonio VillaRaigosa
                                      City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Chris Maunder

                                        Pete O`Hanlon wrote:

                                        Well, the sequencing around this post has become really screwed up

                                        Just a little secret here: I actually have a big button on my screen that says "fix up forums". Sometimes I use that power for good. Sometimes for bad. I am fickle.

                                        cheers, Chris Maunder

                                        CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Pete OHanlon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        It's nice to know that you don't abuse your position.:-D

                                        the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                                        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Bassam Abdul Baki

                                          Science removes the con from your conscience.


                                          "I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

                                          K Offline
                                          K Offline
                                          KaRl
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:

                                          con

                                          , your sentence is still very meaningful


                                          It is easier to make war than to make peace. Fold with us! ¤ flickr

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups