Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. What we say vs. what we mean

What we say vs. what we mean

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptperlcloudcsharpvisual-studio
30 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    honey the codewitch wrote:

    Make is nasty

    No more so than many other products. I used it extensively in my working life, and found it had uses beyond simple software builds.

    H Offline
    H Offline
    honey the codewitch
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    I'm mostly referring to the syntax, and it's about as bad as perl given that it has a smaller surface area. It makes bash look positively readable by comparison.

    Real programmers use butterflies

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      I always use make in Linux (and WSL), even though it means creating Makefiles by hand.

      K Offline
      K Offline
      KateAshman
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Me too! .. mostly because it worked well for me in 2003 and googling a makefile takes about 2 minutes, so why change?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H honey the codewitch

        I'm mostly referring to the syntax, and it's about as bad as perl given that it has a smaller surface area. It makes bash look positively readable by comparison.

        Real programmers use butterflies

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        Any syntax is 'bad' until you learn it. C, C++, Java, Smalltalk, even COBOL ...

        H 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Any syntax is 'bad' until you learn it. C, C++, Java, Smalltalk, even COBOL ...

          H Offline
          H Offline
          honey the codewitch
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          I mean specifically bad as in poorly designed. Not all syntax is created equal despite your implication to the contrary. Significant whitespace is nonsense, for example, both from a parsing standpoint, and from a usability standpoint. Technically speaking it's Broken As Designed. Same with things that cannot easily be remembered by way mnemonic or anything like that. Make is littered with that. Just like code can be readable and unreadable, so can syntax. A grammar can be well designed, or it can be designed poorly. C# is an example of a well designed grammar. Make is an example of a poorly designed grammar. It is what it is.

          Real programmers use butterflies

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H honey the codewitch

            I mean specifically bad as in poorly designed. Not all syntax is created equal despite your implication to the contrary. Significant whitespace is nonsense, for example, both from a parsing standpoint, and from a usability standpoint. Technically speaking it's Broken As Designed. Same with things that cannot easily be remembered by way mnemonic or anything like that. Make is littered with that. Just like code can be readable and unreadable, so can syntax. A grammar can be well designed, or it can be designed poorly. C# is an example of a well designed grammar. Make is an example of a poorly designed grammar. It is what it is.

            Real programmers use butterflies

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            honey the codewitch wrote:

            C# is an example of a well designed grammar. Make is an example of a poorly designed grammar.

            As with most things in life, it depends on your point of view.

            H 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

              I'm using the joke symbol, but this is so painfully accurate it can't really be considered a joke :laugh:

              What we say

              What we mean

              Horrible hack

              Horrible hack that I didn't write

              Temporary workaround

              Horrible hack that I wrote

              It's broken

              There are bugs in your code

              It has a few issues

              There are bugs in my code

              Obscure

              Someone else's code doesn't have comments

              Self documenting

              My code doesn't have comments

              That's why it's an awesome language

              It's my favorite language and it's really easy to do something in it

              You're thinking in the wrong mindset

              It's my favorite language and it's really hard to do something in it

              I can read this Perl script

              I wrote this Perl script

              I can't read this Perl script

              I didn't write this Perl script

              Bad structure

              Someone else's code is badly organized

              Complex structure

              My code is badly organized

              Bug

              The absence of a feature I like

              Out of scope

              The absence of a feature I don't like

              Clean solution

              It works and I understand it

              We need to rewrite it

              It works but I don't understand it

              emacs is better than vi

              It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war

              vi is better than emacs

              It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war

              IMHO

              You are wrong

              Legacy code

              It works. but no one knows how

              ^X^Cquit^\[ESC][ESC]^C

              I don't know how to quit vi

              Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Andrew Leeder
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              A dear friend of mine, Richard Jones (now sadly departed), had a notice on his office wall that read "I know you think you understood what I said, but I don't think you understood that I didn't say what I meant" I have no idea where that quote came from.

              Sander RosselS M 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                honey the codewitch wrote:

                C# is an example of a well designed grammar. Make is an example of a poorly designed grammar.

                As with most things in life, it depends on your point of view.

                H Offline
                H Offline
                honey the codewitch
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                A) Try parsing the syntax. Significant whitespace presents real technical challenges to parsers. B) Try remembering the syntax. If it can't be easily remembered, it's always going to be niche**. See also, vi. ** or replaced with something that is better.

                Real programmers use butterflies

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Andrew Leeder

                  A dear friend of mine, Richard Jones (now sadly departed), had a notice on his office wall that read "I know you think you understood what I said, but I don't think you understood that I didn't say what I meant" I have no idea where that quote came from.

                  Sander RosselS Offline
                  Sander RosselS Offline
                  Sander Rossel
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Reminds me of "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." :laugh:

                  Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                    I'm using the joke symbol, but this is so painfully accurate it can't really be considered a joke :laugh:

                    What we say

                    What we mean

                    Horrible hack

                    Horrible hack that I didn't write

                    Temporary workaround

                    Horrible hack that I wrote

                    It's broken

                    There are bugs in your code

                    It has a few issues

                    There are bugs in my code

                    Obscure

                    Someone else's code doesn't have comments

                    Self documenting

                    My code doesn't have comments

                    That's why it's an awesome language

                    It's my favorite language and it's really easy to do something in it

                    You're thinking in the wrong mindset

                    It's my favorite language and it's really hard to do something in it

                    I can read this Perl script

                    I wrote this Perl script

                    I can't read this Perl script

                    I didn't write this Perl script

                    Bad structure

                    Someone else's code is badly organized

                    Complex structure

                    My code is badly organized

                    Bug

                    The absence of a feature I like

                    Out of scope

                    The absence of a feature I don't like

                    Clean solution

                    It works and I understand it

                    We need to rewrite it

                    It works but I don't understand it

                    emacs is better than vi

                    It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war

                    vi is better than emacs

                    It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war

                    IMHO

                    You are wrong

                    Legacy code

                    It works. but no one knows how

                    ^X^Cquit^\[ESC][ESC]^C

                    I don't know how to quit vi

                    Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gary Wheeler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    How about "emacs and vi both suck, you feeble penguin-molesting twit"

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Thanks for the video, it came at an opportune time.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David ONeil
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Sorry my automated systems failed - you should have a copy of the book in your inbox now. Have a great day!

                      The Science of King David's Court | Object Oriented Programming with C++

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D David ONeil

                        Sorry my automated systems failed - you should have a copy of the book in your inbox now. Have a great day!

                        The Science of King David's Court | Object Oriented Programming with C++

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        Hi David, yes just arrived, thanks. Having watched the video, I look forward t reading the book.

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Hi David, yes just arrived, thanks. Having watched the video, I look forward t reading the book.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          David ONeil
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          I hope you enjoy the intellectual journey! Best wishes.

                          The Science of King David's Court | Object Oriented Programming with C++

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                            I'm using the joke symbol, but this is so painfully accurate it can't really be considered a joke :laugh:

                            What we say

                            What we mean

                            Horrible hack

                            Horrible hack that I didn't write

                            Temporary workaround

                            Horrible hack that I wrote

                            It's broken

                            There are bugs in your code

                            It has a few issues

                            There are bugs in my code

                            Obscure

                            Someone else's code doesn't have comments

                            Self documenting

                            My code doesn't have comments

                            That's why it's an awesome language

                            It's my favorite language and it's really easy to do something in it

                            You're thinking in the wrong mindset

                            It's my favorite language and it's really hard to do something in it

                            I can read this Perl script

                            I wrote this Perl script

                            I can't read this Perl script

                            I didn't write this Perl script

                            Bad structure

                            Someone else's code is badly organized

                            Complex structure

                            My code is badly organized

                            Bug

                            The absence of a feature I like

                            Out of scope

                            The absence of a feature I don't like

                            Clean solution

                            It works and I understand it

                            We need to rewrite it

                            It works but I don't understand it

                            emacs is better than vi

                            It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war

                            vi is better than emacs

                            It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war

                            IMHO

                            You are wrong

                            Legacy code

                            It works. but no one knows how

                            ^X^Cquit^\[ESC][ESC]^C

                            I don't know how to quit vi

                            Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gary R Wheeler
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            In the Before Times, we talked about WYSIWYG(*) being a big deal. (*) What You See Is What You Get With the advent of artificial intelligence and machine learning, it's DWIMNWIS - Do What I Meant Not What I Said.

                            Software Zen: delete this;

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Andrew Leeder

                              A dear friend of mine, Richard Jones (now sadly departed), had a notice on his office wall that read "I know you think you understood what I said, but I don't think you understood that I didn't say what I meant" I have no idea where that quote came from.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Member_14192382
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              A boss of mine actually said that to me once.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups