Mine. ;P And now being serious, anything with a full qwerty keyboard, without touch screen, bluetooth, G3, WIFI... [www.tamelectromecanica.com] Robots, CNC and PLC machines for grinding and polishing.

Ok! Find it out and let me know :) "Don't worry if it doesn't work right. If everything did, you'd be out of a job." (Mosher's Law of Software Engineering)

WebHost4Life[^] offers WSS (not MOSS, AFAIK). I have a web site (not WSS) hosted with them and they are OK. No "wow!", but no "boo" either :) Programming Blog utf8-cpp

Hi, I found the WebVideo.dll from this project : http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/scottlysle/CsharpWebVideo04212007133218PM/CsharpWebVideo.aspx[^] Are we talking about the same dll? Because I used this dll to add components to the toolbox but all I got was a component named WVC which is based on Windows Media Player activex. But I need to use a vlc player based component in my web application, so can you tell me what I can do. thanks a lot..

ResidentGeek wrote: As someone who did test for Microsoft for a long time and still works in the QA industry, don't assume that a professional tester didn't find it. I'd be surprised if basic injection wasn't tested - it was a large segment of test when I worked in Microsoft.com's test organization several years ago, and I doubt it's any different over at MSDN. Things are worse than I imagined. ResidentGeek wrote: just because the test organization found the issue doesn't mean that it was decided to fix it. WOW :wtf: ResidentGeek wrote: Just wanted to speak up for those who may not be at fault here. I am sorry for assuming that the testers didn’t find the vulnerability. I wasn’t aware of the work environment. This is really worse than I could have imagined. ResidentGeek wrote: Test in many companies (and in some, but not all divisions at Microsoft) is often considered an advisory capacity, but the decision about the priority of the bug may actually be determined by the business folks. Again I have to say WOW :omg: ResidentGeek wrote: That's a horrible place for it to happen, since often the business team doesn't have the expertise to make that determination, but the business folks DO hold the purse strings Perhaps this is an argument for product liability in the software industry. If the cost of releasing a defective product was considerable there would be a different cost/benefit equation. ResidentGeek wrote: And, to be fair, it could be that for some reason it would have been very costly or counter-productive to fix it, or there may have been some reason why they chose to allow it. How could it be counter-productive to fix an injection vulnerability. You are not being fair, you are being apologetic for people who are not treating others fairly. ResidentGeek wrote: I saw all of those scenarios at one time or another, at one company or another. I'm not saying I agree with that, just pointing out that it's not fair to imply that the testers were at fault, necessarily. I feel sorry that you had to work under those c

You could do it that way, but it depends how many records you are searching. Where is the data being stored between postbacks? The sqldatasource isn't going to open a connection to the database on every postback only to filter the data after it has been returned will it? The other issue with using viewstate to store your search criteria is that is if the user leaves that page, they have to start all over. I would use a stored proc with parameters and store the criteria in session state. I didn't get any requirements for the signature

Blumen wrote: Right click project - Add New Item - there is no content page listed there in the Open box. No, You will not get Content page in Open Box. Just Select a Web Form and Checked The "Select Master Page" Checkbox on Note : It should only be enabled if you have added a Master page on your web application. or even you can add a web form, delete all aspx code and add those code <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/MasterPage.master" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Default2.aspx.cs" Inherits="Default2" Title="Untitled Page" %> <asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="ContentPlaceHolder1" Runat="Server"> </asp:Content> Note : Change code according to your requriment. cheers, Abhijit Read My Latest Article

Dont Encode before saving them in database. Rather, you should encode after you fetch from the database. Abhishek Sur

Steve Echols wrote: I choose the route that makes sense to me (grids) and what I know works What is that route? “The thing for you is a burial permit. You have only to speak and I will see that you get it.”

Well the thing is here a developer is supposed to gather requirements, design, code, test, and implement the web application/site. So entire responsibility is on him, therefore company expects us to sit back or work on weekends, all they care is job getting done. “The thing for you is a burial permit. You have only to speak and I will see that you get it.”

Roger Wright wrote: rest of us are just figments of the demented imagination of the collective ether, randomly congealed into something slightly coherent in appearance, and existing solely for your discomfort. so that is what you all are :mad:

Mohammad Al Hoss wrote: include the Crystal reports Merge module in the web deployment set up file How do I do that? And normally we don't use setup file for installation, we publish the project to a folder, copy its contents and put it in the virtual directory in the production server. Regards, Blumen