Quit. Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch

In XAML no need to give names to controls

as if anyone would have ben seen dead in anything I had designed, it was so bad it would have easy won the turner prize today You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

AspDotNetDev wrote: Let's go back to the old design! It makes me want to [Dance] Well, it was designed for developers. The new one's for anyone who codes, and we know who that includes! I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Yes, that's my interpretation too. But with 90% or thereabouts (from memory) of sites using Google Analytics I'd wondered if anybody had a good way of getting users to opt in. As I see it, you're essentially saying to them "If you tech the tech tech, then we'll tech tech the tech. Enable tech?", regardless of how well you explain it, nobody will read what you say about it and it will always look like a security problem with the site and or stop them getting to the content they paid for. If I can go to a site and get free content, which in the past I'd have had to pay for, and they record what I did in order to make the site better and/or sell me stuff I might actually want to buy, this seems like a reasonable compromise.

Agreed, thanks :)

Hey Pete, Thanks for the response. I guess these would do the job! I should have thought of italics myself, but the address tag is a new one to me. Thanks, Chris

Good point, well made.

For the record, I never EVER use smilies. But I will make use of L337 once in awhile. lol, jk and ftw have been known to crop up as well. But never will you see any bad graphics posted inside, or to the side, of my text. Josh Davis This is what plays in my head when I finish projects.

Nice! Thanks.

You're welcome - and well done on forum etiquette here. "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes. My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

Thanks for the suggestion - looks a bit tricky to use from .Net, but beggars can't be choosy.

Thanks - I like that idea. There are some places I'm not sure it will flow right still, but that certainly makes it tidier. I like the idea that they can jump to the fuller definition - very good as it will make it more readable for people who already know about it!

Luc Pattyn wrote: publishing the approver's identity. Good idea. Anyone from the staff listening in? I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Wjousts wrote: I'm not sure comparing iPod to Hoover is a great selling point. I don't think many people believe Hoovers are vastly superior to other vacuum cleaners. True, but that may be an excellent way to try and sell a Zune

You've given me a new time-waster! Try http://www.bananaproject.com/[^] and http://www.teddybearproject.com/[^] I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Not to my knowledge. Not to worry then. I don't know if you have looked at SMIL[^] at all, but it might be worth considering? It should allow simple videos while being more secure then Flash... Anyway, thanks for the help! Chris

Tried - yes, worked - no. As for my opinion Python if above my understanding. But who knows - may be I will use it some day, same as Ruby. ------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!