W∴ Balboos wrote:
It's really more of a what information is presented.
Sure it is, but i feel like the media should be aware of what is about the inhabitants of a country and what they should know. It's abvious you can't get all the info within 15 minutes. But i guess that if they use material of others it should be statet as such and also the own view of the situation should be statet as such. It often feels like their opinion is the only allowed by cutting down crucial information.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
but left out key information that completely changed the context.
That is the worst case and i guess this is the reason why so many theroies are comming up. And from my perspective such things should not happen.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
You article, which will take me a while to understand,
I hope you already got a little into it. Because on the "news" (actually a news magazine of a private tv program) i yesterday saw the next big thing. They throw away their id to fool the system and pretend they are underaged (but are roughly around 25-30Y old) so they get better treatment.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
I fear that it's going to be as you say - although the first blows are more likely to occur elsewhere in Europe.
The first blows are already striking if you get intel from sweden, also goverment changes to right wing (German for nazis) in Poland, France and others are just a first step to the next catastrophe.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
(what may already be obvious: I no longer have cable television, I stream it all - I get to hear everyone's lies on-demand!).
A good choice after all :) But to get back to the topic. MH-17 was shot down by a BUK, that is something that seems quite clear after all now but they still can't make out who shot it, because basically the estimated lauch position seems to be on "russian" side but also could have been occupied by "rebels". AFAIK. But I think we both can agree on forced diss- or missinformation of the main media according to our experience.
Rules for the FOSW ![