Can anyone give a comparison of the advantages between IZArc and 7-Zip?

I agree. I use IZArc and am completely satisfied with it's operation and interface.

You are welcome and I truly hope I haven't offended you. Family is very important at times like these. I just prayed for you and your family.

Thank for putting that into words.

If you mean offering a hand up is "taking advantage" I'd have to agree.

Wrong time, wrong place.

I'm not interested in proving anything to you. I'm trying to provide comfort to someone who is hurting. Rather than attack my attempt, why don't you provide your version of confort?

I know I'm going to get flamed for this but it's important. You need to find out what it means to accept Jesus as your Saviour and Lord. There is no hope otherwise. Find a Christian friend and ask him what this means and where to start. Let me know if I can help.

Chris Losinger wrote:

discuss it all you want. but don't pretend it has anything at all to do with actual science.

Kind of like much of the "science" surrounding both sides of the global warming debate, huh?

If you can show me one example of one species becomming another, we could talk about evolution's place in science. If macro evolution, the evolving of a completely new species is unverifiable, unrepeatable and cannot be scientifically refuted, then why is this a better explaination for man than a creator? If you had never seen a watch before, and you found one on a beach, would it seem logical to postulate that it evolved out of sand, or some other primitive substance? You could postulate evolution of the watch without intelligent intervention, but you would be wrong. No matter how often you said it evolved by selection you would be wrong. No matter how many scientists said that was how it happened, they would be wrong. The idea that science has the final answers at this time is as old as science. If you feel free to discuss ID as if it couldn't happen when all you really know is that it might not have happened then please, allow me the same freedom to discuss evolution, or whatever your favorite theory of the origin of man, with the same freedom.

Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

is equivalent to the ID argument that "man is so complex a creator must be involved". The complaint from those holding this hypothesis is that they claim the immediate removal of all evidence and selectively choosing elements that they wish.

Is it scientific to ignore the possibility that a creator was involved? What if a creator was involved? Is science a search for truth or only politically correct answers?

In other words "Our data doesn't provide the required accuracy but someone elses must." Great example of "group think."

altruistic?

Yah, I read it in the Davinci Code.

What if Google bought Borland?

I believe that this also includes the Delphi line which has some pretty vocal support although I don't know what kind of money is involved.

Sorry, my scanning abilities are not what they used to be. I need to read more carefully. Good luck on your exams.

Is this as far as you want to go in your education?

Does that mean we can't post programming questions here?:sigh: You might be a tad too subtle.

Try PSPad http://www.pspad.com/en/[^]. It has some very nice features and it's free.