Thanks, Mike.. that was actually the answer I wanted to hear :) -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

Rohit Sinha wrote: I'm afraid you will have to write your own code for this, unless you decide to use something which is already out there. I did: http://www.funduc.com/decenc.htm It does exactly what I need :-) Rohit Sinha wrote: In any case, my suggestion would be to install your dll as a proxy for the server. That is exactly what it is: a filter application for a certain mailserver (ArgoSoft). See http://triplef.marbus.net for more details. Thanks for your reply -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

window.print(); should load the print dialog to the screen, however it won't run the window.close(); function until the print dialog has closed by the user hitting the print button or hitting the close button on the dialog. Otherise the code works for me. :) HTH Nick Parker **The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it. - Unknown **

Thanks Joaquín. The main issue is that is really must be platform independent (thus, standard C++). However, I read on the website (http://www.pilotltd.com/irun/) that the sourcecode is available on request. I think I might contact them (unless somebody else knows a better solution?) -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

Mazdak wrote: In VC.7 there is new class for richedit.Go to dialog editor.You'll see "Rich Edit 2.0 Control",this one is for new version. I create several CRichEditCtrl's (3.0) dynamically, it's not limited to a dialog: I place them on a a CxxView. But thanks again :) -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

I've used multiple checkouts for years with VSS. There are some caveats though, and you need to understand a few things. Lost changes will only occur in a few situations: 1) You are changing files locally without checking it out first, then you checkout the file without getting the most recent version and check it in. 2) You're trying to multiply check out a file that doesn't work well with multiple checkouts (such as the resource.h file) 3) Someone rolls back to a previous version. Those are the only cases where changes can get lost (and this is from nearly 8 years of using VSS (and SS back before MS bought it). All of this boils down to knowing how to use it, ie: user error. Now, there are potential problems with database corruptions. These occur in basically one of three situations: 1) VSS crashes in the middle of a check-in (i've never seen this happen though) 2) You are using a flaky network connection that can drop packets. This is common when dialing in and your connection drops, or when your network has lots of collisions and other problems. 3) Your disk becomes corrupted. If you make sure you are always using a reliable network, and you work on a reliable OS (such as NT/Win2k/XP) then you should never have any real corruption problems. It also helps to run the repair tool at least once a week to clean up minor inconsistencies that can occur from time to time when files are deleted or links changed. So, the rule to having a good VSS experience (for the most part) is: 1) Always use reliable networking 2) Always use a reliable OS 3) Use the multiple checkout feature the way it is supposed to be used, and don't try to work around it. 4) Never try to multiply check out either the .dsp or resource.h file. -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

Yes, I meant the left- and topmargins (couldn't remember what the right words were :)).. Not sure if it's ok, but I believe the right tags are leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" to be IE and NN compatible. -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

I know, but most people know the word "trekky" (sp?). Still, it was a *very* clever use of C & P. C++/C# Student. Wither Thee VB.Net.

My guess is, that if Office continues to be available on the Mac, eventually the amount of .NET stuff they will cram into office will make it pretty nasty for them to develop it in parallel without a .NET runtime on the Mac...? Perhaps... Anyway, OS X has just about tempted me enough to buy a Mac this 'upgrade' rather than waste my money on a P4 that will be out of date in no time as WinXP bloats like all the rest and makes 2GHz look paltry ;P ... the (XP) UI is okay, but a bit gaudy and looks like a kid's interface anyway, compared to mmmm... AQUA ... mmm...

Mac support certainly existed - I used it for a while. It was an add on for VC++ 4.0 which compiled code for 68k and PowerPC macs running System 7 or later on the PC, and then transfered them to the Mac for testing/debugging. The programs I wrote using it ported smoothly, but they were very simple. I never found any need to learn much about the Mac OS. Niall.

Yep, my manager was very interested in that link. Thanks. Steve Maier, MCSD

So do we, we receive all languages... but I never see any information about ordering extra boxes.. and I don't want to use those ugly old boxes :( -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

YEs its crap. I can't watch it, it is too depressing. The whole plot line is based around conflict. The most amazing thing is:- a) The salaries the actors get (£100,000 to £300,000 a year for that rubbish!) b) The actors actually get nominated (and have won) for the quality (good grief) of their acting. Sheesh. Stephen Kellett

Stop picking your nose! ;P -- Alex Marbus www.marbus.net But then again, I could be wrong.

Microsoft has stated more than once that 95 is included as a .Net target OS, so I wonder how this jives with dropping support for it. David

Interesting comments, especially the part about thinking for yourself. A lot of people use the "think for yourself" argument against those who believe God's Words, but those same people do little or no checking of their own assumptions that the Bible is wrong or irrelevant. (Not that this is what you're necessarily doing.) How conceited do you have to be to believe that an omnipotent force (i.e. God) created an entire universe just for humans? Someone would have to be pretty conceited to believe that. That belief also goes against everything the Bible teaches. One good verse on the subject is found in Revelation 4:11, "Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for Thou hast created all things , and for Thy pleasure they are and were created." In reference to your comparison of religion and cults, most of what you said is right. However, someone who properly believes the Bible does not take the word of a human. He is believing the words of the God who wrote them. Also, laws in general (and their punishment) are for our own good. If there were no laws, a lot more people would be hurt by the resultant anarchy or the natural consequences of their actions. I despise brainwashing as well, but convincing myself of the truth by studying surely isn't brainwashing. As for placebo effects and proof of the Bible. It is conceited (accidentally in your case, I hope) to assume that you know enough to say that someone else's conclusions are based upon emotions, ungrounded facts, or teachings that they have not researched for themselves. (I realize that you weren't talking to any one person.) I personally have done a lot of study on the validity of the Bible. It is a truly amazing and unique book. There is no possibility of a "bunch of drunken mathematicians" putting it together "as a joke about the reason things are the way they are". Why? The 66 different books were written by some 33 different authors over a period of a few thousand years. It would be rather difficult for them to collaborate with each other, but the things taught in one book by one author are also taught in other books written by different authors. Every prophecy in the Bible has either come true, or the event has not yet occurred, and none of the things taught by the Bible have been proven wrong. Together, those form strong evidence for the truth of the Bible since no person, group, or other book can validly claim that (at least according to my studies). (BTW, archeology has shown that these p

which one?! You will find it! in my name. Regards, Paul. Paul Selormey, Bsc (Elect Eng), MSc (Mobile Communication) is currently Windows open source developer in Japan, and open for day job or programming contract anywhere!

For starters, sorry my english :) this is not pi related but it´s inspired by this post: <<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <

I've been told that ATI drivers have problems with OpenGL. The 16 and 32 bit (depth) open gl drivers for my laptop crash with a priv instruction exception. OK at 8 bit colour depth though. I don't know if these problems extend to non-3D accelerated modes. I've been told there are updated and more stable drivers at the ATI web site. You could try updating your drivers. Video drivers were moved into the kernel in NT 4.0 (I think it was 4), and as such if they go belly up, so does your hardware :-) Stephen Kellett

Because it's coming! The new MFC and ATL libraries are here, we can use the new compilers, and the beta 1 VS.NET is totally useable. .NET is still in beta but that isn't stopping hundreds of companies from working on .NET components, or hundreds of sites from moving to ASP.NET. If I didn't make an effort to make you guys ad girls more aware of the potential benefits of .NET - and have a little bit of fun at the same time - then I would start getting 'Is CodeProject going soft' emails. The competition is NOT simply a C# or managed C++ comp - it's a competition about everything that is in the new package and I for one would very much like to see some MFC and ATL articles based on the new library. C# and VB.NET have had way too much of the limelight. cheers, Chris Maunder