ok thanks,i will do it. tomer

Thanks, as far as i know the Page_Load called before the OnClick and it is cause me problem. i am binding the control to a data source in the Page_Load event(just like i saw in many examples),sometimes when the user press a specific button,i dont need to bind the control,but on the OnClick event it is too late isn't it? thanks. tomer

Hi, My custom webcontrol contains two buttons, both genrates PostBack. on the Page_Load event i am binding the control to a data source,but i need to do it only when user press the first butto. in the Page_Load event is it possible to now which button genrate the PostBack? BTW:The "button" are LinkButton and Button thanks in advance.

Giles wrote: Yes, like 'Weak Europeans' not liking Israel's existing methods like troops from Israel gunning down kids? We don't do this,it is a lie.i was in the IDF, i know,never me or one of my soliders deliberately fire at a palestinian kid wish you would defend the jewish kids right to live as much as you defends the palestinians right to live Giles wrote: Israel of all countries should be the fisrt to think twice yes we should wait until he get the bomb. thanks for a very good advise. Giles wrote: As for Europe, its not within firing range of his rockets, but I will think you will find Israel is. wake up Europe,Still don't get what USA said? you don't need rockets any more to deliver nuke!!! BTW we do have the bomb(s), what should a country in a state of war with many countries like israel should do? how can anyone compare between israel and the arab world?!?!? we are a wetsern democracy we have the rule of law they have the law of the rule. any way i dont see future for united europe the islamists will take europe in amatter of 20 years...if you will need some place to hide you can always come to israel. cu. i dont want to fill the forum with my opinions so i will stop writing about this issue,but you can email me directly if you want tomerdr@hotmail.com

Martin Marvinski wrote: the great Israeli news News?!?!? maybe you ment to say-fairy tails-? enjoy the reading,but dont forget to remove 99% of the deatils....

peterchen wrote: Because in this trial, the US is Makes the law, determines the penalty and executes it. Better USA than other country. peterchen wrote: And would you consider the thought that the US has strong economic interest as much as the "weak europeans"? I am sure it is true,but what's is wrong with that? in general US interests are not far a way from the world interests! any way,might is right!! because when you are might you can give up some of your interstes in order to preserve justice and moral. erupoe for example is a weak nation,it deals with evil countries like iRAN,IRAQ,SIRYA,LIBYA and other, they dont care about the arab people which lives under the rule of dictators!!

we can't!, it is time to bring freedom to the arab people. how come most countries(especially weak europe) prefers economic interests instead of justice?

Rashid here is what i did 1.create a composite control 2.put it on a VB form 3.choose a command button control from the VB toolbox and put it on the atl composite control the result is that the command button control didnot become a child control of the composite control,if i move the composite control the command button control stay in his place i just want to create a control like SSTab,of FRAME

Thanks Rashid, i already tried to create a composite control,but it didnot work on vb,i mean i could not add controls to the composite from VB i found that MFC use OLEMISC_SIMPLEFRAMESITE and ISimpleFrameSite to create a simple frame container thanks. tomer dror

Hi, I want to create ATL control like MS Tab control to use on VB form How can i create this control in such a way that user can select other controls from VB toolbox and insert it on my control i tried to register drag and drop target inside my control but it wouldnt work if user just put the control and not drag it. i understand that i need to use CComCompositeControl inside my control but do i need to expose other interfaces for VB? thanks tomer

jan larsen wrote: And no, I do not believe that the Palestinian suicide bombers are coming to any western civilizations in the near future, you see: their problem is Israel. You are totally wrong! a while ago there was a"minor" terror attack in the USA,remember?,as far as i remember those terrorist committed SUICIDE, also if i am not mistaken i just read about an islamic group who want to create an islamic nation on you planet Denmark!!! it will take time,but at the end you will feel it too! jan larsen wrote: Let me get this straight: You have informants telling that there are suicide bombers on their way to Israel, but these informants do not know who, where and why?. Well let me tell you a secret: THERE ARE SUICIDE BOMBERS ON THEIR WAY TO ISRAEL!!!.... no,jan i think you didn't get it,terror organization built from small cells,sometimes we have one man from this cell,who we believe that knows that someone else from this cell going to kill mothers and childrens,we use limited force in order to get the information out of it, of course me make mistakes,but we are talking about general issue,any way you already agree that in some cases you would use the same methods!!! jan larsen wrote: How can Israel blame a coming Palestinian state for the terror acts of e.g Hamas? maybe because they(PLA) don't try to stop them? pay them money? dont arrest them? remember the one which we killed in GAZA,and as a mistake we also killed 17 others? we ask PLA to arrest him a year ago!!! where was EUROPE than? this tragedy could have been prevented! did you know that more than 60% of the last terror attacks was made by the FATAH which is the political wing of ARAFAT? jan you don't understand that SUICIDE BOMBER is made out of hope!,yes!!! he thinks that by doing this he will achieve political goals. you must understand that terror gains legitimacy in some societies in order to achieve political goals,ever thought why there are so many group in the PLA,why so many security forces? jan larsen wrote: if that is the rules of the game then it is also legal to blame Israel for any crime an Israelian have done But you do it all the time,more than that,when arabs kills arabs (in sabrah and shatilla) you blame a jew......

jan larsen wrote: It stated very clearly that this was not the case. I don't understand what you mean to,any way it is the case,arabs do live there. jan larsen wrote: Yes I would, but that is clearly not the situation, the person that attaches electric devices to someones testicles are obviously not doing this for saving his actual relatives, the goal is rather abstracted from this and to be able to perform those deeds without any direct threat takes a psycopath whooo!!!! but we don't do such things!!,what the court permit to do is the following: 1.prevent him from sleep 2.shake him those tools only used on a "ticking bombs" and only by court permission. jan larsen wrote: You have never been in that situation, the suicide bombers are mostly people that faced with no future seeks revenge for their murdered relatives, they never give ultimatums. ground control to major jan (on planet denmark),can you hear me? it is a joke right? maybe you don't understand what we talked about,many times we have people who knows that a suicide bomber is on his way to kill childrens and mothers,we call the situation a "ticking bomb" 'now you face with 2 options,shake the men,or wait to the news.....and here the news is not relate to MTV award..... did you know that israel prevent more than 80% of the terror attacks?!? jan larsen wrote: Take a good look at what Sharons tactics have brought you it start long before sharon become to be prime minister,demonize sharon is an ARAB tactic ,obviously they succeeded..at least in your planet.... jan larsen wrote: Retreat to the original limits of Israel How can we retreat if we don't agree on the borders? this should be discussed between israel and the Palestinians,do you really think that a state,can retreat because of terror threats? can't you understand that if the terror beat israel he will beat the west?! any way we did it in Lebanon,and they coming from Lebanon,and killed our people,and kidnapped 3 solider and one civilian...did the Denish newspaper wrote about it too...let me guess......NO! Jan,you have the right to criticize israel of course,i don't seek balance,i really don't,what's bother me with your(EUROPE) criticize is that it is only goes towards israel,ARAB nations commit terrible crimes against humanity,and i didn't see any single demonstration in Denmark against them! at lea

jan larsen wrote: Recently there was an article in one of the most respected Danish newspapers that told about a Palestinian MD that wanted to move to a community I guess that this respected Danish newspapers didn't mention that there are already arabs who lives inside this community? jan larsen wrote: What do you think would happen if a German community proposed that it should be legal to disallow Jews in certain districts to preserve the tradition?. It is not the same,the suggestion was not to disallow arab,rather to allow a community to reject any kind of people,there are arab community which don't accept jews for example,why own community don't accept all jews again,try not to be simplistic,you have two rights which collide,the right of a person and the right of a community,it is not an easy question. jan larsen wrote: while on the other hand they destroy every state building structure that would deliver the means to comply. should a state building used by terrorists? they didn't comply even when they have 30,000 "policemens", no other country have this amount(ratio) of policemens!!!! one can think that one day we decided to destroy the PLA,you forgot all the bombs in our cities? we have no other option! jan larsen wrote: This looks an awfull lot like a tactical move comparable to the ever expanding limits required by the increasing number of settlements. It is tactical the same way expending arab settlements is,this is a disputed land if they can build we can too. jan larsen wrote: but what kind of person do you think would make a torturer?. maybe the kind who want to save life? what kind of person do you think would not use any means to save life? once again,two rights collide "not be tortured",and "stay in life",if those the only options i would choose to tortured,you would do the same if you could save the life of one of your family members,so please dont pretend to be a "TZADIK" i still waiting for your suggestion,what should we do when we have ticking bomb in our hand should we let it kill children? or should we use alimited force in order to make him tell what he know?

do you enjoy to be so simplistic? or is life on planet Denmark so simple? jan larsen wrote: arabs can be banned from a city if the city council states that the presence of such a person will break the integrity of the current culture First of all arabs cannot be banned,it was a suggestion by some parliament members which didn't become a law second this suggestion is not for arabs only,it says that a community either arabs,jews or druze have the right to preserve their tradition inside a small community we are not talking about cities! only SMALL communities Why is the right of a person to live where ever he want,is important than the right of a community to preserve it's tradition? farther more,why is the right of a person more important than the right of a community? jan larsen wrote: Or that the government openly supports torture What should we or other western democracy do when we have a ticking bomb in our hands should we ask him nicely:"please tell us all you know" there is the rights of a man not to be torture,and there is the right of a civilian to stay in life what happen when those right are collides? should we need to be simplistic as you?. i do not know how life on planet Denmark is,but here in our planet sometimes, you need to choose between two alternatives which both aren't perfect,wish you could suggest other solution to this moral issue...i guess you can't that is what Europe does...you can allways call the USA. Any way the fact that our law approve use of a limited force in special cases in order to save life does not mean that we are the only country that uses force,we just dont speak with two voices,do you realy think that no other country use force against terrorist??!?! jan larsen wrote: As long as Israel is depriving the Palestinians of the tools for building a democratic state come on! there is no other arab state which is democratic,is israel to blame for that too? jan larsen wrote: Or that the current leader of the state is responsible for the massacre on hundreds of men, women and children Yes,Sharon is responsible,and he paid the price,he was banned from being minister of defense,ELI HUBEIKA on the other hand who command the massacre was until recently a minister in the government of Lebanon no criticize what so ever had been made by you and your fellow eurponians The Lebanese Christian Phalangis

Brit wrote: But, equally, who says it is the Israeli's land? Ultimately we dont says it is our land we want to share it,they dont.that's what make us in a better moral position,no many countries give back land which was captured in a war which was forced on them,shouldn't be a price to pay if you open a war? Brit wrote: (Why is the Israeli government supporting these settlements in the first place? It seems to me to be a provocation to the Palestinians.) Why not? why palestnians can live in israel and jews cannot build new settlements? live,and build is a provocation? having say that..i myself in general willing to return lands,though i thinks it is belongs to us,the reason that i dont want to give it now,is becuase i can't be sure it will be the end of the palestnians demdnad,surely some europininas will find reason to give more lands to ARAFAT.....

damir_tk wrote: The UN resolution was made after a pressure from the US and Jewish lobby, so don't mix up intentionally the order of the happenings. ha...i knew it should come somewhere...the mighty jewish lobby....yes...but how does it relates to the fact that ARABS didn't accept the compromise...i know it doesn't...! damir_tk wrote: Who ever said that there has to be a democracy or nothing else? There is at least one advantage for a democracy over a dictatorship,democracy can become a dictatorship by the will of the people,in a dictatorship,there is not such things will of the people(i hope in English there is..sorry..for my english),there is only a will of the dictator damir_tk wrote: There are billions of ppl on this planet that do not want democracy ha!? did you use the same methods ASAD of syria use? did you know that he got 99.99% of votes?! damir_tk wrote: and you do not even want to think at least for a moment about the reasons that led to that The reason is simple:people jealous in US,some people get MOTIVATION to be like US,some people get MOTIVATION to destroy the US it is all about education,nothing more if you educate a young boy that he is a bird by the age of 20 he will try to jump from a building.... What make the people of europe so blinds? how come a western democracy like israel (which is not perfect of course) doesnot backed by eurpoe? what is wrong with the education you get there? isn't any more good and bad in europe?

jan larsen wrote: Just as sure as if Sharon told the invaders (what do you call those people that steal the land from the palestinians after the Israeli soldiers have moved the original owners?) that they should stop killing Palestinians, then of course they would comply. Too much CNN? who said it is a palestinians land at all? nobody steal land,and nobody killed palestinians as a policy of the government,you are talking nonsense jan larsen wrote: they should stop killing Palestinians, then of course they would comply. And after being bombed and disarmed then Arafats people have a lot of power to enforce this we don't ask them to enforce it,we just ask arafat to say it in ARABIC,arafat does not want to pay even this political price for the peace,sure he does not need to, he have friends like you in europe... any chance you will start to using you heads instead of relay on ARAB an MUSLIM propaganda?

The UN resolution stated that the land should be divided between ARABS and JEWS,those who didn't accept the compromise were the ARABS! we didn't claimed the entire land,not than not now! damir_tk wrote: At the end, nobody answered to why Americans were always attacking weaker countries? Is is more efficient! if you win against the weak you could attack the stronger too! we are not all the same,a nuke in the hand of a democracy is not the same as the one in the hand of a dictator! there must be "double" standards,how can you judge a democracy and a dictatorship with the same tools? it is not about race,it is about regimes!

damir_tk wrote: In 1982-1984 Israel invaded Lebanon, killing thowsand of refugees in the camps of Sabra and Shatilla with American tanks, American guns The Lebanese Christian Phalangist militia was responsible for the massacres that occurred at the two Beirut-area refugee camps on September , 1982. Israeli troops allowed the Phalangists to enter Sabra and Shatila to root out terrorist cells believed located there. It had been estimated that there may have been up to 200 armed men in the camps working out of the countless bunkers built by the PLO over the years, and stocked with generous reserves of ammunition. When Israeli soldiers ordered the Phalangists out, they found hundreds dead (estimates range from 460 according to the Lebanese police, to 700-800 calculated by Israeli intelligence). The dead, according to the Lebanese account, included 35 women and children. The rest were men: Palestinians, Lebanese, Pakistanis, Iranians, Syrians and Algerians. The killings came on top of an estimated 95,000 deaths that had occurred during the civil war in Lebanon from 1975-1982 The killings were perpetrated to avenge the murders of Lebanese President Bashir Gemayel and 25 of his followers, killed in a bomb attack earlier that week. Israel had allowed the Phalange to enter the camps as part of a plan to transfer authority to the Lebanese, and accepted responsibility for that decision Ironically, while 300,000 Israelis demonstrated in Israel to protest the killings, little or no reaction occurred in the Arab world. Outside the Middle East, a major international outcry against Israel erupted over the massacres. The Phalangists, who perpetrated the crime, were spared the brunt of the condemnations for it. By contrast, few voices were raised in May 1985, when Muslim militiamen attacked the Shatila and Burj-el Barajneh Palestinian refugee camps. According to UN officials, 635 were killed and 2,500 wounded. During a two-year battle between the Syrian-backed Shiite Amal militia and the PLO, more than 2,000, including many civilians, were reportedly killed. No outcry was directed at the PLO or the Syrians and their allies over the slaughter. International reaction was also muted in October 1990 when Syrian forces overran Christian-controlled areas of Lebanon. In the eight-hour clash, 700 Christians were killed-the worst single battle of Lebanon's Civil War. Eli Hobeika, on the other hand, who directly commanded the slaughter of Palestinians was a minister in lebanon until

Daniel Ferguson wrote: I suppose there are no strings attached. How much Amuricun money goes into Israel? More than that, I suspect. it's irrelevant,we do get 3g$,but this what make us the best friends of the US in this region,what should bother you that only US backing us,a western democracy which is in a state of war with more than 20 countries Daniel Ferguson wrote: And the MOSSAD does not have a problem with using fake Canadian passports to travel around with? No doubt they only have the best intentions. ha?! how does it is relate to ARAB dictators,excpet the fact that some time we use those passports in order to topple the dictators? Daniel Ferguson wrote: Not really. If I were there, I would want to leave too. I'm not willing to fight and die for the stupidity of my ancestors. yes that's true,but we always hear in CNN that arabs hate the US!!! Daniel Ferguson wrote: The Middle East seems to be full of men insecure about the size of their dicks who are trying their best to prove that they are well endowed. It's only natural for the US to get involved too. we just want to live,like you,i want to open the radio and to hear in the top news, that "codetools" won some awards.... Daniel,we live in different worlds,you don't know what is the feeling to live in a country which is under a daily threat for it's is own existence Tomer Israel