The original statement was "Iran's policies aren't dictated by the US". I wasn't arguing that the US doesn't pressure governments to follow its policy on some issues. I was arguing against the statement that governments are puppets of the US government, doing whatever they say in all cases. To make the reverse statement "Iran's policies are dictated by the US" says that all of Iran's policies are controlled by the US, but there aren't any examples of any other countries doing this. Taking a look at the specific case of Denmark, and ignoring the question of whether the US had a legitimate reason to ask this of Denmark*, it would still be incorrect to say that "Denmark's policies are dictated by the US", wouldn't it? Sure, there may be instances where they did what the US wanted (for better or worse), but I see this as a big step away from having their policies, in general, dictated by the US. * Taking into account the fact that during the Cold War, the US spent as much as all the European NATO members combined on the defense of Europe, and therefore it is arguably legitimate for the US should be allowed to ask members to contribute a little more.