I use and like DNN, even for small sites typically. It is easy to host hundreds of simple sites on a single instance of DNN which means a smaller foot print for the sites (if needed). The main draw for my to DNN is how simple it is to build sites rapidly and the client can modifiy them if they desire without futher work on my part. I can build a typical small business website consisting of one of my standard skin templates that I have available already, along with buidling out 5-10 pages of html/pics (assuming I have to type in the content and make some choices of exactly how I want it to look), all within an hour or two, including making the site live. Clients also like freedom that if anything happens to your business, they can still modify their site themselves. It adds a nice touch of ownership to a site that they usually do not get if you right a custom site that they cannot modify themselves. Also, they vast array of modules that are available (some good and not so good) allows cleints flexibility with small or no extra cost. If just down the road a week or two, they hear that businesses should have a blog, boom, you drop in the blog modules and in less than 20 minutes, they have their blog live. Support forums come to mind a little down the road, no problem, drop in one of the many forums modules and boom, you have forums all running on the site with little effort. On top of this, there is limited RSS built in along with a site search. Yep, sold on DNN! Performance could be better, but I am sure it will get there. Still very good and stable (at least the version I use), allowing you to knock out simple sites and have all the power there to expanding them when needed without having to rewrite anything. Rocky <>< Latest Post: SQL2005 Server Managemnet Studio timeouts! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]